User talk:Tanbircdq: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:21, 15 May 2018 editRenamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (talk \| contribs)90,395 edits →Discretionary sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:19, 21 May 2018 edit undoAlssa1 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users4,591 edits →May 2018: new sectionNext edit →
Line 388:		Line 388:
	Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.		Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
	}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)		}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

			== May 2018 ==

			Hello. You appear to be involved in an ] on ] and ].

			While ] is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

			If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see ]. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

			If you feel your edits might qualify as one of ], please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting ] or ] is a much better course of action.

			''Continued edit warring on ] and ] or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice.'' ] (]) 18:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:19, 21 May 2018

This is Tanbircdq's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

Template:User talk disclaimer

Archives

• 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 •

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome

Hello, Tanbircdq, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Ray 23:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Misplaced Pages Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette Practice civility

Nomination of Mahmud al-Rashid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmud al-Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mahmud al-Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri 18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17440 was submitted on Feb 01, 2017 22:13:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

UTRS appeal #17748 was submitted on Mar 12, 2017 19:25:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the five years I was editing the encyclopedia, and I have made large contributions in creating and improving many articles from a wide variety of subjects. I intend to generally make gnome edits to any article I come across for maintenance but have a particular interest in those of involving British Bangladeshis and Muslims. I've been blocked due to the result of SPI and AE against me. I acknowledge that the poor conduct leading up to my ban was unacceptable and I do not dispute to receiving the ban. Before this I had a good record of engaging and collaborating with other editors in good-fath. I understand that there are ways of resolving conflict resolution without resorting to behaviour which contravenes policy guidelines. During my block, I have made contributions on the Commons page. I feel I can make further constructive and productive contributions, therefore, should be give the opportunity to be allowed to return to the website.

Accept reason:

Accepted with unblock conditions, as described below. ~ Rob₁₃ 18:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please provide a full history of your socking, including whether it continued after your block, and a deeper explanation of what led you to sockpuppetry/why I should believe you will not do it again. You were caught socking twice (one in 2014, a second time leading to your indefinite block), so I will need a thorough and candid explanation to have any chance of convincing me a continued block is not preventative. ~ Rob₁₃ 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

A full history is available on the SPIs here and it did not continue after by block as I haven't edited Misplaced Pages since other than the contributions on the Commons page. The first instance was just stupidity. The second instance was due the frustration and injustice I felt after an editor accused me of having an agenda and I retaliated.

I've gone over nine months without editing, I'm not sure if I would now have time to be as active as I was before but there are potential Misplaced Pages pages which I was working on that I'd like to publish and there are many pages which I previously regularly edited that I would like to continue to update. I have absolutely intention of socking, should I be allowed to return, my contributions are likely to be fairly minimal in the future, I'll probably steer clear of conflicting topics on the whole and concentrate more time on topic areas which take less effort and patience to come into fruition. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Do you have any comments as the blocking admin, Coffee? I'm inclined to grant this request with a set of reasonable restrictions. I would specifically like clarification from you that this block was not an AE action, even though it originated from an AE thread. I assume this is the case because the duration exceeds that which can be applied via discretionary sanctions and I see no evidence it was logged. ~ Rob₁₃ 01:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: I can confirm that this was not an AE action. It seems quite reasonable to allow the WP:OFFER to apply here. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@Tanbircdq: Could you talk a bit more about what conflict led you to feel the need to sock? I'll offer you an unblock under a set of conditions, but I'd like to ensure the conditions help you return to regular and uncontroversial editing. ~ Rob₁₃ 03:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Rob, sorry for the late reply. The conflict was that I added sourced material on a page, to which I was accused of having an agenda, however, despite this continued constructively contributing on the talk page only for the matter to be preemptively taken to ANI where it was shown I had done nothing wrong. After this I felt it untenable, and too disheartened and despondent to contribute on the page but I then regrettably decided to lash out. Tanbircdq (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Coffee and BU Rob13, I can't use talkback, I would appreciate if you'd please response here, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Per our policy on conditional unblocks, I'm willing to unblock you provided you agree to two restrictions. First, you are restricted to a single account indefinitely. This restriction may be lifted or modified by the community or by myself to allow another account to be used for some specific purpose. Note that this restriction bars you from even those use cases of alternate accounts that are typically considered legitimate (e.g. public-use accounts or bot accounts) unless the restriction is lifted or modified. Down the road, I'd be more than willing to entertain reasonable requests to lessen this restriction, if you have a compelling reason to use an alternate account. Second, for the next six months, any uninvolved administrator may re-block you at their discretion for any disruptive activities, up to and including an indefinite block. This more-or-less formalizes the reality for all standard offers; this is a last chance, and there are no warnings left to be had. If you find these restrictions acceptable, ping me and I'll unblock you. ~ Rob₁₃ 22:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi BU Rob13, I find these restrictions acceptable, thank you. Tanbircdq (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Religion and ethnicity in infoboxes

A little over a year ago, two RfCs concluded that religion and ethnicity should not be allowed in biographical infoboxes, see:

Please do not add them to infoboxes, as you did in this edit. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Dilly Hussain listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dilly Hussain. Since you had some involvement with the Dilly Hussain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Misplaced Pages requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mr. Bean into Mr. Bean (character). While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on British Bangladeshi and Munsur Ali

Material you included in the above articles appears to have been copied from copyright web pages elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Also, as a result of this discussion, the Daily Mail is not longer considered a reliable source for this wiki. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Abu Eesa Niamatullah

Hello! I am notifying interested projects and editors that I've listed Abu Eesa Niamatullah for discussion at AfD, and you were listed on the revision history page.

I invite you to contribute to the discussion. Mujaddouda (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Swine/11 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swine/11. Since you had some involvement with the Swine/11 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

I would comment that if someone makes a nom based on "not in the target article," and you add it to the article while the nom discussion is going on, it might be nice to disclose that fact. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahi Muqit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mahi Muqit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.retinasurgeon.uk.com/about-mahi/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mahi Muqit. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nusaiba Mohammed

Hello, Tanbircdq. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nusaiba Mohammed, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Excessive linking; ethnicity and religion; and social media external links

In this edit you reverted a number of improvements to article Ahsan Akbar:

You added numerous links to everyday words used in context, links that are very unlikely to be followed. Readers of the English-language Misplaced Pages are not stupid, they are sufficiently familiar with occupations like "writer", locations like the "United Kingdom", and concepts such as "British" that they do not need to read entire encyclopedia articles about them to understand the main topic, in this case the subject of a biography. WP:OVERLINKING elaborates on what overlinking is and why it is harmful to the encyclopedia.

There has been overwhelming consensus since RfCs Religion in biographical infoboxes and Ethnicity in infoboxes not to include religion or ethnicity in infoboxes. Your continued addition of them, despite this having been explained to you before, is not constructive. It does not change how the infoboxes are rendered, but does pollute maintenance categories and creates extra work for other editors. Please stop adding them. You are welcome to mention them in the body of the article if relevant and properly sourced.

Misplaced Pages is not here to promote every social media account of its subjects. Normally only one official link is included. Avoid adding more, particularly when they are prominently linked from the first official webpage. See WP:ELMINOFFICIAL for more information.

Remember that you do not own articles that you create, and should respect the contributions of fellow editors. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Maya Ali (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maya Ali (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Maya Ali (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Orphaned non-free image File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Corbyn

I have removed undue material from many biographical articles of individuals endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn which you added. Usually, this is because the additions are disproportionate to their real significance, reactive rather than active, and of limited notability. Sometimes, as with Peter Tatchell and George Monbiot, it misrepresents their variable response to Corbyn over the last two years. Philip Cross (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ewan McGregor.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add misleading edit summaries. 4TheWynne 23:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

As you appear to have ignored my message here. Following on from MidnightBlueMan's findings, I don't see what purpose this warning serves over this edit. You reverted my edit and then accused me of making disruptive edits, threatening me with being blocked etc over a "misleading" edit summary which if you used your common sense you could see the edit summary was a mistake but the edit was clearly a good faith minor edit that didn't require being reverted.

As it clearly says on my talk page template; Do not template me. I am a regular editor and I take your template as seriously rude behavior. I may even report you as a rude editor. Tanbircdq (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

It appears that I missed the finer details – I didn't even notice the message, to be fair, and for that I apologise. I was only concerned about the misleading edit summary, which I didn't realise was just a mistake – whenever and wherever I see something like that, I just take action, and in this case, I shouldn't have. 4TheWynne 12:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

No worries, apology accepted, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Moved Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn

Hi Tanbircdq, Thank you for your interest in Bernie Sanders. I just wanted to inform you out courtesy that I moved your contribution, regarding endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn under "Political positions" to Political positions of Bernie Sanders#Endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn. I did this because the other topics in "Political positions" in the main article are general in nature, as befits a main article, whereas his endorsement of Corbyn is a very specific stance, more appropriately covered in the latter arcticle. I hope that you will find this acceptable. I'll watch for your comment here, if it's OK with you. If not, let's discuss at Talk:Bernie Sanders. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 21:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi HopsonRoad, thank you for having the courtesy to take the time to explain your removal. I do agree that Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is quite specific as opposed to some of the other topics in the "political positions" section. However, I do think it's notable enough to have a general summary on main page with specific details elaborated on "political positions" page. I hope that you will agree that this is acceptable, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply, here, and your engagement at Bernie Sanders, Tanbircdq. I have a symmetry question for you. If mention of Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is notable in the Sanders article, is it not also similarly notable in the Jeremy Corbyn article, where I find no mention? As an editor, I would not have considered either the giving or the receiving of the endorsement to be sufficiently notable for a main article, unless it had an effect on the course of events. Sanders, for instance, is making waves in the other political positions mentioned, whereas the first time that I learned of his endorsement of Corbyn was through your contribution. On Corbyn's end, do we suppose that Sanders' endorsement had a positive effect? I recognize from your citations that it made the news in Great Britain. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 13:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah

Hi-- I've come across Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah after another editor started adding links to it in various article. The article is a WP:CFORK of Sunni Islam. The phrase is the formal Arabic term for Sunni Islam, and I see nothing in the sources cited there to indicate that it is commonly used in English to refer to some denomination that is distinct from what is normally referred in English-language RSs as Sunni Islam. Please see the citations with quotes in Sunni Islam (whose Arabic counterpart, by the way, is titled أهل السنة والجماعة). I can see that you've put significant work into this article and understand that you may be disappointed by its becoming a redirect. You may want to consider whether some content there is suitable for merging into Sunni Islam. I've considered it myself, but I couldn't find any complementary content there based on solid academic sources. Eperoton (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Aminul Islam Bappi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aminul Islam Bappi is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aminul Islam Bappi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Abdur Rahman Madani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rahman Madani is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rahman Madani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Speedy deletion nomination of Aladin Ali

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aladin Ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Sonata (play)

Hi Tanbirdcdq, regarding this edit, please be aware that the "International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature" is a spammy and likely predatory journal. It's published by "ARC Journals", listed by Beall here. See also Predatory open access publishing. I encourage you to not use such articles and to remove them from Misplaced Pages articles if you see them. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scottish motivational speakers

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish motivational speakers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Merger discussion for Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast

An article that you have been involved in editing—Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. I would suggest keeping your article as the main one, copying any missing information from Nature of the Beast (Film) before turning it into a redirect to your article. Thank you. Certes (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tanbircdq. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Mahi Muqit) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mahi Muqit, Tanbircdq!

Misplaced Pages editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work on the article on Mahi Muqit. Thank you for your contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Indian-American films

I hope you are the right person for this.

I was looking at Category:Indian-American films on Misplaced Pages - it would be really good if you could update as it's 3 years old.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.246.119 (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Tanbircdq (talk)

Nomination of Nazia Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazia Ali is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nazia Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Iftekhar Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iftekhar Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Iftekhar Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Emdad Rahman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emdad Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Emdad Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

A page you started (Shoebox (musical)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shoebox (musical), Tanbircdq!

Misplaced Pages editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Misplaced Pages takes copyright violation very seriously. You must not copy/paste copyrighted information into articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Positive Money

Thanks for finding some valid content for this article. One thing of concern, however. The bit about Dyson founded it after reading a book is WP:UNDUE. It might belong in Dyson's biography if he says that this was a key moment in his intellectual or political development, but it is not of encyclopedic interest in an article about the organization. Every organization, after all, is founded by individuals acting out of knowledge and belief. It is WP:SYNTH to associate the author of a published book with Dyson or with Positive Money in this way. If the author has made any statements about Positive Money, that would be a different matter and those statements might be due weight in the Positive Money article. Please remove this bit about the book that you have just re-instated. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 23:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message about your on about whether the origins of how the organisation was founded should be included on the article. However, as you can clearly see from the diff that I have not "re-instated" this content and the last revision shows this content was already in the article.

If you have concerns about this then I suggest that you take this to the talk page rather than canvassing me directly. Thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for discussion

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for discussion

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors has been nominated for discussion

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Aspire (political party) councillors has been nominated for discussion

Category:Aspire (political party) councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Yusuf Islam albums has been nominated for discussion

Category:Yusuf Islam albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hoult

Hey, could you talk back at the article's talk page? Thank you. VedantTalk 20:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anwara Ali

The article Anwara Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Councillors or mayoral *candidates* are not notable under WP:NPOL. Rest of the article is minor stuff. The "British Bangladeshi Who's Who" is not a reliable source as people submit their own biographies.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Question

Hi, im Tiberius. I saw one of your edits on the article Jeremy Corbyn and thought i'd check out your user-page. According to your page you are a Bangladeshi socialist, what i want to ask about is wether you are a member/affiliate/supporter of any particular political party? Tiberius Jarsve (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, no I'm not a member, affiliate or supporter of any political party in Bangladesh. Tanbircdq (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thatcher

Hi. Just look at the infobox. Where does the title "Prime Minister of the United Kingdom" appear? Nowhere, that's where. An insane outcome. That's why I've reverted your edit twice. -- Jack of Oz 22:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

RFC On new article title, Antisemitism in the Labour Party

Their is currently a RFC discussion on renaming the article: "Alleged Antisemitism in the Labour Party"

If you care to respond, is open for discussion and opinions, thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Positive Money

I suggest you read the instructions and conditions for removing the notability tag. You are joining an edit war that's been waged over an extended period by Single Purpose Accounts and sockpuppets. What is the array of independent, reliable sources written directly about this organization that you believe establishes notability beyond all doubt? If you have such references, please add them and their associated content to the article. If not, as the instructions say, raise your concerns on talk but do not remove - or in this case please undo your removal - of the template. The purpose of the template is to attract editors to add valid well-sourced content to the article, and premature removal thwarts that objective. SPECIFICO talk 21:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

"beyond all doubt"? This is not a court of law. This is Misplaced Pages. You are straining too hard to impose your beliefs. Reissgo (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 ~ Rob₁₃ 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party and Labour Party (UK).

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party and Labour Party (UK) or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Alssa1 (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)