| Revision as of 03:09, 3 August 2018 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 67) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:00, 4 August 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 67) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| |age = 5 | |age = 5 | ||
| }}__FORCETOC__ | }}__FORCETOC__ | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for your edits, I agree it is . He is mentioned and acquainted with many anarchists and newspapers, but I am searching for proper proof, e.g. writing or formal organizational membership to indicate such. The publication ], of which he was an editor of oscillated between exclusively anarchist, to socialist etc.. ] (]) 16:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi ]. Any ] that describes Feigenbaum as an anarchist would be sufficient. I'll go through the indices of some of the books I have about anarchism and anarchists to see if they mention him. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 17:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi again ]. While I didn't find any reference to Feigenbaum being an anarchist, I found three things about him that may be of interest to you. | |||
| ::*In his book '']'', historian ] has a chapter about Jewish anarchism in the United States. He mentions the movement's hostility to religion, particularly to traditional Judaism (they would hold balls on ]). Among the pamphlets and tracts they circulated, Avrich writes, was "Benjamin Feigenbaum's ''Passover Hagadah According to a New Version'', was imported from London and distributed in large quantities." The ] lists many of Feigenbaum's anti-religious tracts in its . Evidently they were widely reprinted. Of Feigenbaum's "hagadah", Avrich wrote earlier in '']'': "... an early piece of anarchist literature which ''Der Arbayter Fraynd'' had published in 1886 in London but labeled 'Vilna' to deceive the tsarist police. In the form of a Passover ''Hagadah'', or prayerbook, the pamphlet set forth the traditional 'Four Questions,' which begin, 'Wherefore is this night of Passover different from all other nights in the year?' but gave them a radical twist: 'Wherefore are we different from Shmuel the factory owner, Meier the banker, Zorekh the moneylender, and Reb Todres the rabbi?'" Let me know if you want bibliographic information to cite either of the Avrich books in the article. | |||
| ::*''The New York Times'' ran an account in 1906 of a parade in New York to commemorate the anniversary of the ]. It mentions some of the speakers: ], ], ], and "B. Feigenbaum", among them. Let me know if you'd like me to send you a copy of the article, which only mentions Feigenbaum's name, or if you want bibliographic information to cite it as a source in the article. | |||
| ::*Finally, in 1932, the ''Times'' ran an obituary when Feigenbaum died. As was the style, it has four headlines that summarize the article: "B. FEIGENBAUM DIES; SOCIALIST LEADER. One of Founders of Workmen's Circle Long Associated With The Daily Forward. STUDENT OF THE TALMUD. Formerly Gave Lectures in Evening Public Schools Here to Popularize Scientific Subjects." Let me know if you'd like me to send you a copy of the article. | |||
| ::— ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you for looking into this! I am familiar with ]'s book and will add the relevant portions of it. Feigenbaum regularly faked the years too in manuscripts he sent back to Congress Poland, to evade Russian censors. Do you have advice on how to mention very obvious inferred information? For example, how he was a fan of William Morris, and also (coincidentally?) named his son William Morris. I did not find any articles mentioning this, so it would likely qualify as ]. To conclude, I do not need any more citation or articles than what you offered already here ] (]) 03:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Unfortunately, without a source that says Feigenbaum admired Morris, I don't think you can state it as a fact. You can, however, state that his son was named William Morris and cite any genealogical source that mentions the connection. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2018 == | == July 2018 == | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 4 August 2018
 |
|
 Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
July 2018
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Sandstein 09:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Misplaced Pages's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire