| Revision as of 15:31, 13 August 2018 editNewimpartial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,849 edits →Cthulhu Britannica: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:43, 13 August 2018 edit undoChetsford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators40,362 edits hiNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| '''Improper nom by clueless editor''' The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. ] (]) 15:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | '''Improper nom by clueless editor''' The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. ] (]) 15:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi Newimpartial - I see you're mass copy/pasting a declaration that I'm "{{xt|clueless}}" across several recent AfD discussions , , , , , etc. As you're aware, this is extraordinarily disruptive to the AfD process. I don't personally mind if you use personal attacks against me, however, they might discourage other editors with more sensitive constitutions from joining in the discussion. Thanks for your consideration. ] (]) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 15:43, 13 August 2018
Cthulhu Britannica
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Cthulhu Britannica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yet another product page in the Cubicle 7 WP:WALLEDGARDEN. Tightly paraphrased puzzle book is unreferenced except to a single RS. A search of newspapers.com, Google News, and JSTOR fails to find any additional RS coverage. Chetsford (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
User:Tyw7, you have just listed a series of published books to the Deletion lists for Video games and Technology, neither of which applies (Games does apply). Could you remove them? I thought it better to make the request rather than do it myself, so that the removal could be discussed if necessary. Newimpartial (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. Newimpartial (talk) 15:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Newimpartial - I see you're mass copy/pasting a declaration that I'm "clueless" across several recent AfD discussions , , , , , etc. As you're aware, this is extraordinarily disruptive to the AfD process. I don't personally mind if you use personal attacks against me, however, they might discourage other editors with more sensitive constitutions from joining in the discussion. Thanks for your consideration. Chetsford (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)