Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Candidate statements/Questions for Nandesuka: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006 | Candidate statements Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:17, 5 November 2006 view sourceFys (talk | contribs)14,706 edits Three questions← Previous edit Revision as of 17:59, 5 November 2006 view source Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,486 editsm →Questions from []: spNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
1. What can be done to reduce the delays in the arbitration process? 1. What can be done to reduce the delays in the arbitration process?


2. Would you anticipate participating in the actual writing of decisions. If so, do you have writing experience relevat to this task? 2. Would you anticipate participating in the actual writing of decisions. If so, do you have writing experience relevant to this task?


==Questions from ]== ==Questions from ]==

Revision as of 17:59, 5 November 2006

Please ask your questions here. Thanks! Nandesuka 14:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

A question I ask of randomly-selected candidates (although it was originally planned for all to answer):

  • What is your opinion of ex-admins who have not voluntarily given up their sysophood? Do you think they should be resysopped at AC's will, or do you think that they should go through another RfA? What are your thoughts on the current re-adminship process for involuntarily-desysopped admins? – Chacor 15:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Questions from Newyorkbrad

Welcome to the race. My standard questions. Newyorkbrad 15:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

1. What can be done to reduce the delays in the arbitration process?

2. Would you anticipate participating in the actual writing of decisions. If so, do you have writing experience relevant to this task?

Questions from Fys

  1. I will be asking the same three questions to every candidate. 'Arbitration' is a process of dispute resolution. If the parties to an arbitration, after it has gone to the committee, manage to resolve the dispute or any part of it themselves, would you continue the case or that part of it? If so, why, and if not, why not? Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. What role do you believe private discussions between the parties and members of the committee should play in determining the outcome of Arbitration cases? Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Probation. Under what circumstances should users who have not had any restrictions on their editing imposed, be removed from probation? Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)