Misplaced Pages

The Anita Bryant Story: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:06, 12 October 2018 editFreeknowledgecreator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users179,107 edits Summary: rm - the whole thing was based on secondary sources, and I don't wish to write an article summary on that basis← Previous edit Revision as of 22:28, 12 October 2018 edit undoFreeknowledgecreator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users179,107 edits Evaluations in books: linkNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


===Evaluations in books=== ===Evaluations in books===
The law professor ] wrote in ''Sex and Reason'' (1992) that while ''The Anita Bryant Story'' is not scholarly, it reflects widespread beliefs about homosexuality. Posner criticized Bryant's views, writing while the causes of a same-sex preference are not well understood, the main factors involved appear to be genetic, hormonal, developmental, or some combination thereof, not recruitment, and that Bryant's assertion that gay people can change their sexual orientation is false in most cases.{{sfn|Posner|1992|page=224}} The law professor ] wrote in '']'' (1992) that while ''The Anita Bryant Story'' is not scholarly, it reflects widespread beliefs about homosexuality. Posner criticized Bryant's views, writing while the causes of a same-sex preference are not well understood, the main factors involved appear to be genetic, hormonal, developmental, or some combination thereof, not recruitment, and that Bryant's assertion that gay people can change their sexual orientation is false in most cases.{{sfn|Posner|1992|page=224}}


Jordan wrote of ''The Anita Bryant Story'' that, "Bryant's thin narrative is interlarded—interrupted—with exhortations, observations, and too many quotations. The book keeps breaking its own plot line, jumping forward to its conclusions, because the reader is supposed already to know how the story ends." Jordan viewed the book as an effort by Bryant to show her "benign intentions and reasonableness". He suggested that Bryant's use of "ritual repetition" made her language resemble "the language of worship, of creed, litany, psalmody."{{sfn|Jordan|2011|page=137–138}} Jordan wrote of ''The Anita Bryant Story'' that, "Bryant's thin narrative is interlarded—interrupted—with exhortations, observations, and too many quotations. The book keeps breaking its own plot line, jumping forward to its conclusions, because the reader is supposed already to know how the story ends." Jordan viewed the book as an effort by Bryant to show her "benign intentions and reasonableness". He suggested that Bryant's use of "ritual repetition" made her language resemble "the language of worship, of creed, litany, psalmody."{{sfn|Jordan|2011|page=137–138}}

Revision as of 22:28, 12 October 2018

The Anita Bryant Story: The Survival of Our Nation's Families and the Threat of Militant Homosexuality
Cover of the first edition
AuthorAnita Bryant
LanguageEnglish
SubjectAutobiography
Published1977
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages156
ISBN978-0800708979

The Anita Bryant Story: The Survival of Our Nation's Families and the Threat of Militant Homosexuality is a 1977 book by Anita Bryant, in which the author provides an account of her evangelical Christian campaign against a gay rights ordinance in Dade County, Florida. The claims Bryant makes about homosexuality in the book have been described as false and unscholarly in nature.

Background

According to the philosopher Mark D. Jordan, The Anita Bryant Story was originally to have been titled Save Our Children: One Woman's Fight against the Sin of Homosexuality, but after the international relief organization Save the Children secured a preliminary injunction requiring the Bryant's campaign change its name from Save Our Children to avoid confusion, the title of Bryant's book had to be changed as well.

Reception

Mainstream media

The journalist M. Stanton Evans gave The Anita Bryant Story a positive review in National Review, writing that Bryant's "frequent arguments from Scripture confirm the view that she is deeply religious but refute the libel that she is any sort of bigot." Evans welcomed Bryant's lack of regret for the consequences to her of her opposition to gay rights.

Academic journals

Casper G. Schmidt, writing in the Journal of Psychohistory in 1984, suggested that Bryant outlines the major issues of concern to opponents of gay rights, and that she was correct in believing that repeal of the gay rights ordinance in Dade County would provoke a larger backlash against the gay rights movement.

Evaluations in books

The law professor Richard Posner wrote in Sex and Reason (1992) that while The Anita Bryant Story is not scholarly, it reflects widespread beliefs about homosexuality. Posner criticized Bryant's views, writing while the causes of a same-sex preference are not well understood, the main factors involved appear to be genetic, hormonal, developmental, or some combination thereof, not recruitment, and that Bryant's assertion that gay people can change their sexual orientation is false in most cases.

Jordan wrote of The Anita Bryant Story that, "Bryant's thin narrative is interlarded—interrupted—with exhortations, observations, and too many quotations. The book keeps breaking its own plot line, jumping forward to its conclusions, because the reader is supposed already to know how the story ends." Jordan viewed the book as an effort by Bryant to show her "benign intentions and reasonableness". He suggested that Bryant's use of "ritual repetition" made her language resemble "the language of worship, of creed, litany, psalmody."

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. Jordan 2011, p. 237.
  2. Evans 1978, p. 169.
  3. Schmidt 1997, pp. 55–56. sfn error: no target: CITEREFSchmidt1997 (help)
  4. Posner 1992, p. 224.
  5. Jordan 2011, p. 137–138.

Bibliography

Books
Journals
Categories: