Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:03, 8 November 2018

Archives (index)

2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Thousand Oaks shooting, you may be blocked from editing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa 15:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Thousand Oaks shooting. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 15:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ACanadianToker reported by User:Serial Number 54129 (Result: ). Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 15:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

You are pathetic. I WAS THE ONE WHO MADE A TALK PAGE ENTRY! - A Canadian Toker (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

ACanadianToker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I WAS THE ONE WHO MADE A TALK PAGE ENTRY! You are a BULLY! - A Canadian Toker (]) 15:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I WAS THE ONE WHO MADE A TALK PAGE ENTRY! You are a BULLY! - A Canadian Toker (]) 15:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I WAS THE ONE WHO MADE A TALK PAGE ENTRY! You are a BULLY! - A Canadian Toker (]) 15:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You won't get unblocked if you keep shouting in all capitals. Please calm down and take a deep breath. Ritchie333 15:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

you are nothing but a bully. I was the one who made the talk page entry, you chose to bully me for no reason. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

cited, relevant. only reason was what? 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

same reason I cant even edit the talk pages! @Ritchie333: is a BULLY! - A Canadian Toker (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

pathetic @Ritchie333: - A Canadian Toker (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

• Your unblock request needs to focus on your conduct and your conduct only. You have to convince us that, if unblocked, you will follow policies and be a net positive to the project. Personal attacks against other editors don't do that for you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

I blocked you because other editors filed a complaint that they were unable to update the article because your edits kept clobbering them. If I had to point a finger at the real issue, it's because currently the MediaWiki software only allows us to protect a page (so nobody can edit) or block an editor from everything (so they can't discuss the issues). Obviously I can't protect, as there are too many people editing the article, and doing nothing would have probably resulting in another administrator blocking anyway.

My advice to you is this - I can take a bit of being slagged off, it comes as part of the job, but it won't help your case. You won't get unblocked unless we can get absolute assurances that you won't touch the article anymore, and will restrict your editing to the talk page. There usually isn't any great requirement to rush and scramble to be the first to edit, as Misplaced Pages is not a newspaper. Ritchie333 15:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: you are a BULLY! So now you're blackmailing me to restore access? Those other editors are who should be blocked. I made the talk page, to DISCUSS THE ISSUE. Instead the biased just found YOU a BULLY! I will not be blackmailed. You should be ashamed of yourself for bullying me on Misplaced Pages. Pathetic. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

How convenient that I can't even edit the talk page to discuss the issue. But you never wanted that anyway. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock