| Revision as of 10:19, 15 November 2006 editAlanBarnet (talk | contribs)762 edits →Recent reverts on NLP: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:38, 15 November 2006 edit undoAction potential (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers9,090 edits →Recent reverts on NLP: check it against words to avoid, and style guide.Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| The rules in the policy pages are clear. You will need to read up on language improvement first. NPOV policy page is the best, and there is a lot more you could do about words to avoid - also there is a lot of blurb with no sourcing, you seem to know the subject a bit so I suggest finding sources for that pretty pronto. ] 10:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | The rules in the policy pages are clear. You will need to read up on language improvement first. NPOV policy page is the best, and there is a lot more you could do about words to avoid - also there is a lot of blurb with no sourcing, you seem to know the subject a bit so I suggest finding sources for that pretty pronto. ] 10:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I have access to Psychinfo (OVID), so I can look it up here. I'll rewrite that Techniques section and make sure it is in line with the style/source before posting it. Your edits to the scope section were fine. Please add the <nowiki>{{fact}}</ref> to any views that require citations. --~~~~ | |||
Revision as of 10:38, 15 November 2006
Recent reverts on NLP
I fixed up the language on the techniques section of the NLP article. Only to have it reverted by you without discussion. I'll work on another revision of it and post that tomorrow. Please discuss it before reverting. --Comaze 10:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
The rules in the policy pages are clear. You will need to read up on language improvement first. NPOV policy page is the best, and there is a lot more you could do about words to avoid - also there is a lot of blurb with no sourcing, you seem to know the subject a bit so I suggest finding sources for that pretty pronto. AlanBarnet 10:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have access to Psychinfo (OVID), so I can look it up here. I'll rewrite that Techniques section and make sure it is in line with the style/source before posting it. Your edits to the scope section were fine. Please add the <nowiki></ref> to any views that require citations. --~~~~