| Revision as of 01:58, 12 March 2019 editBoomer Vial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,907 edits →Blocked: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:58, 12 March 2019 edit undoBoomer Vial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,907 edits →Blocked: spacingNext edit → | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Your account has been '''] indefinitely''' because it is suspected that it has been ]. If your account is ], please contact {{nospam|trustandsafety|wikimedia.org}}. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the ] (specifically ]), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=<var>your reason here</var> ~~~~}}.</div>]{{z12}}<!-- Template:Uw-compblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Your account has been '''] indefinitely''' because it is suspected that it has been ]. If your account is ], please contact {{nospam|trustandsafety|wikimedia.org}}. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the ] (specifically ]), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=<var>your reason here</var> ~~~~}}.</div>]{{z12}}<!-- Template:Uw-compblock --> | ||
| :I just don't see a user who was extremely active in reverting vandalism and going on to . ] (]) 04:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC) | :I just don't see a user who was extremely active in reverting vandalism and going on to . ] (]) 04:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ] Wrong. I see since the accusation of my account being compromised didn't stick, you've moved on to baseless accusations that I'm a sock. Just stop. You're embarrassing yourselves. ]<sup>] • ]</sup> 01:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC) | :] Wrong. I see since the accusation of my account being compromised didn't stick, you've moved on to baseless accusations that I'm a sock. Just stop. You're embarrassing yourselves. ]<sup>] • ]</sup> 01:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked, but not for account compromise == | == Blocked, but not for account compromise == | ||
Revision as of 01:58, 12 March 2019
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is Boomer Vial's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 |
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you. Boomer Vial |
|
If I see something such as a box, template, image, etc., on another user/user talk page that catches my eye, I will "borrow" it. More than likely without asking. ;) Boomer Vial |
WikiLove, barnstars, and more!
Insertion of BLP violations
Here you reverted the removal of a flagrant BLP violation, with the edit summary "Rvt; not a valid explanation for removal of sourced content." Except that the offending content was not sourced (and it's highly, highly questionable whether it would have been suitable for inclusion even if it was). Please be more careful about this sort of thing in the future. Steve Smith (talk) 00:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Inquiry from a Public Relations Representative for Biogen on Updating Misplaced Pages Article
Hello,
My name is Matt Nemet and I am a Public Relations professional at GCI Health, a firm specializing in healthcare. One of our clients, Biogen, has expressed concern regarding outdated information found on the Misplaced Pages page for its multiple sclerosis treatment candidate, Opicinumab.
We understand that Misplaced Pages readers depend on active and thoughtful editors for accurate and supported articles. Additionally, we felt that given your previous efforts editing Misplaced Pages pages like Opicinumab you might be interested in reviewing this page through the lens of updating older information.
To further disclose our position, we are aware that per Misplaced Pages’s guidelines neither the company nor the company’s representatives can make direct edits to Misplaced Pages pages. Respecting these rules, our priority is ensuring that this issue is appropriately brought to light. Therefore, we are engaging you, an experienced editor who can be trusted with assessing the current state of the page against publicly available information on Biogen and Opicinumab to make accurate and appropriate updates.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best regards, MSN2017 (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Boomer Vial. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Is there an explanation for this edit?
Do you have any explanation for this highly-inappropriate edit, or should we be considering taking action such as a topic ban from gender-related topics? NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- NorthbySouthBaranof I reverted it after I did it, lmfao. What absolute Nazism that you threaten to ban me for vandalizing an article one time, and proceeded to revert said vandalism. Misplaced Pages has become a joke. The true proprietary of fake news. Boomer Vial 00:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, revoking talk page access because this account has clearly been compromised. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Blocked
wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.Template:Z12
- I just don't see a user who was extremely active in reverting vandalism and this sort of stuff going on to vandalize an article this way. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ian.thomson Wrong. I see since the accusation of my account being compromised didn't stick, you've moved on to baseless accusations that I'm a sock. Just stop. You're embarrassing yourselves. Boomer Vial 01:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Blocked, but not for account compromise
CheckUser indicates that there was no compromise on this account and that this is not the first time you have vandalized Misplaced Pages. Your block as a compromised account has been converted to a CheckUser block. If you wish to appeal, follow the instructions at WP:GAB. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- TonyBallioni Stop lying. That's not me, and have zero evidence that it is. Oh, let me guess? We're just supposed your word for it because you're an admin? How sad. Boomer Vial 01:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)