| Revision as of 02:44, 20 November 2006 editGay Cdn (talk | contribs)38,969 editsm cat← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:31, 20 November 2006 edit undo198.172.203.235 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ] 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ] 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''keep''' just found this article googling for material on kafenio. it may not look important 4 years off, but in its day it had a big readership. for me much more important: it gave many young writers a chance to get published because alf did all he could to recommend us to other publishers. | |||
| ] 14:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:31, 20 November 2006
Kafenio
Article does not demonstrate notability of subject or provide documentation SteveHopson 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Which would then include about every other e-zine.
- Kafenio was the first e-zine about Europe
- About half the travel e-zines are patterned after it
- It had the highest readership of all travel zines that ever were on the net
- Was recommended by Writers Digest as one of the best zines to contribute to 3 years in a row mostly due to readership and notability.
if those are not notable facts I wonder what is.
Because most of the documentation available is only on the net I decided to write an e-mail to the former publisher for information, which as far as I learned is a standard way of research. If needed I can produce these e-mails.
The question I have is if this is really about Kafenio, or, if Kafenio is removed, SteveHopson is right about the lack of notability of Roberta Beach Jacobson below.
Rough 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- keep just found this article googling for material on kafenio. it may not look important 4 years off, but in its day it had a big readership. for me much more important: it gave many young writers a chance to get published because alf did all he could to recommend us to other publishers.
198.172.203.235 14:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Categories: