Revision as of 14:36, 1 April 2019 editAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers637,867 edits Assessment: Sexuality (Stub/Low) (Rater)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:17, 1 April 2019 edit undoLord Bolingbroke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers14,989 edits →Image: replyNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::Then, go ahead and do it or I can do it when I feel like it. I believe in good faith that there is infringement. I do see that you have received quite a fee notices of usage outside of fair usage in the recent past. ] (]) 14:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC) | :::Then, go ahead and do it or I can do it when I feel like it. I believe in good faith that there is infringement. I do see that you have received quite a fee notices of usage outside of fair usage in the recent past. ] (]) 14:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::{{u|Graywalls}}, I don't know what you're talking about re: past fair usage violations. That's not a fair statement, but whatever. If you decide not to tag the image for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, then someone else is just going to add the image back to the infobox... Again, you're not making a potential problem known. I've tagged this article as unillustrated, so expect someone to add the image back in the near future. I'm not going to keep going back and forth about it with you here. ---] <sub>(])</sub> 14:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC) | ::::{{u|Graywalls}}, I don't know what you're talking about re: past fair usage violations. That's not a fair statement, but whatever. If you decide not to tag the image for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, then someone else is just going to add the image back to the infobox... Again, you're not making a potential problem known. I've tagged this article as unillustrated, so expect someone to add the image back in the near future. I'm not going to keep going back and forth about it with you here. ---] <sub>(])</sub> 14:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::{{ping|Graywalls}} The (which was uploaded to Commons and used in this article) was taken in 2006; the on ''WW''{{'s}} flickr account was uploaded in 2007. It is quite possible that ''Willamette Week'' is the one infringing copyright for failing to attribute the source of their photograph. As the Commons file properly attributes Minar, I don't think it is a copyright violation to use the image in this article and have therefore it. If you disagree with my assessment, feel free to nominate ] for deletion on Commons. ] (]) 16:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:17, 1 April 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Club Portland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Club Portland be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
Image
@Graywalls: Hello! If there's a problem with the image, can you please nominate for deletion at Wikimedia Commons instead of just removing here? The image will be removed automatically if deemed problematic at Wikimedia Commons, but just removing the illustration here is not solving the problem. Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see that as an excuse to reinstate infringing contents uploaded by someone else. Go ahead and do so. You've been editing long enough and know better than that. Graywalls (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, If one looks at the file at Commons, no problem is evident. Just removing the image here will just make people think the image at Commons has not yet been added to the article. If you believe there's a problem with the file, you should make this known, not just edit the infobox here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Then, go ahead and do it or I can do it when I feel like it. I believe in good faith that there is infringement. I do see that you have received quite a fee notices of usage outside of fair usage in the recent past. Graywalls (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, I don't know what you're talking about re: past fair usage violations. That's not a fair statement, but whatever. If you decide not to tag the image for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, then someone else is just going to add the image back to the infobox... Again, you're not making a potential problem known. I've tagged this article as unillustrated, so expect someone to add the image back in the near future. I'm not going to keep going back and forth about it with you here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Graywalls: The flickr photo by Nelson Minar (which was uploaded to Commons and used in this article) was taken in 2006; the identical photo on WW's flickr account was uploaded in 2007. It is quite possible that Willamette Week is the one infringing copyright for failing to attribute the source of their photograph. As the Commons file properly attributes Minar, I don't think it is a copyright violation to use the image in this article and have therefore restored it. If you disagree with my assessment, feel free to nominate File:Club Bathbohouse.jpg for deletion on Commons. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Then, go ahead and do it or I can do it when I feel like it. I believe in good faith that there is infringement. I do see that you have received quite a fee notices of usage outside of fair usage in the recent past. Graywalls (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Stub-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Stub-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Misplaced Pages requested images