| Revision as of 18:44, 15 April 2019 editPsantora (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,899 edits →Further reading: add link← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:16, 7 June 2021 edit undo39.37.161.216 (talk) →See alsoTag: section blankingNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| {{col-begin}} | |||
| {{col-break}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| {{col-break}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| {{col-break}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| {{col-break}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| {{col-end}} | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 09:16, 7 June 2021
Inquiry education (sometimes known as the inquiry method) is a student-centered method of education focused on asking questions. Students are encouraged to ask questions which are meaningful to them, and which do not necessarily have easy answers; teachers are encouraged to avoid giving answers when this is possible, and in any case to avoid giving direct answers in favor of asking more questions. In this way it is similar in some respects to the Socratic method. The method was advocated by Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner in their book Teaching as a Subversive Activity.
Overview
The inquiry method is motivated by Postman and Weingartner's recognition that good learners and sound reasoners center their attention and activity on the dynamic process of inquiry itself, not merely on the end product of static knowledge. They write that certain characteristics are common to all good learners (Postman and Weingartner, pp. 31–33), saying that all good learners have:
- Self-confidence in their learning ability
- Pleasure in problem solving
- A keen sense of relevance
- Reliance on their own judgment over other people's or society's
- No fear of being wrong
- No haste in answering
- Flexibility in point of view
- Respect for facts, and the ability to distinguish between fact and opinion
- No need for final answers to all questions, and comfort in not knowing an answer to difficult questions rather than settling for a simplistic answer
In an attempt to instill students with these qualities and behaviors, a teacher adhering to the inquiry method in pedagogy must behave very differently from a traditional teacher. Postman and Weingartner suggest that inquiry teachers have the following characteristics (pp. 34–37):
- They avoid telling students what they "ought to know".
- They talk to students mostly by questioning, and especially by asking divergent questions.
- They do not accept short, simple answers to questions.
- They encourage students to interact directly with one another, and avoid judging what is said in student interactions.
- They do not summarize students' discussion.
- They do not plan the exact direction of their lessons in advance, and allow it to develop in response to students' interests.
- Their lessons pose problems to students.
- They gauge their success by change in students' inquiry behaviors (with the above characteristics of "good learners" as a goal).
See also
References
- Postman, Neil, and Weingartner, Charles (1969), Teaching as a Subversive Activity, Dell, New York, NY.
Further reading
- Awbrey, Jon, and Awbrey, Susan (1995), "Interpretation as Action: The Risk of Inquiry", Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15, 40-52. Eprint
| Neil Postman | |
|---|---|