Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kobrakid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:29, 22 November 2006 editThulean (talk | contribs)394 edits Black People← Previous edit Revision as of 19:47, 22 November 2006 edit undoPatrick0Moran (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,602 edits 3RRNext edit →
Line 87: Line 87:


You have violated 3rr rule. You have reverted all or parts of the article more than 3 times in 24 hours. Please take your last revert back or I'll report you.] 19:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC) You have violated 3rr rule. You have reverted all or parts of the article more than 3 times in 24 hours. Please take your last revert back or I'll report you.] 19:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

==Your request that I limit myself to one edit per day==

What are the edits that you are objecting to, specifically. Most of what I have done in the last day have been spelling and punctuation errors. I have been surprised by the argumentative and dismissive edit summary you made,
"(revert POV pushing by Patrick to last version by Halaqah, I've read Sforza & know what he said. Sigh, this was a good article a week ago)" It is generally not considered good practice to flame people in edit summaries.

You just made a negative comment saying, "You're not deleting anything," to my explanation for why I had replaced content that was valid that somebody had deleted. Read over what I said and note that I replaced the material you seem to think I want to delete. ] 19:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:47, 22 November 2006

Hello Kobrakid, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! CobaltBlueTony 19:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting help
Getting along
Getting technical

Image tagging for Image:CarlCushnie20040605.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CarlCushnie20040605.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 22:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Black People

You are telling me not to change article without debate but you arent adding anything to debate. See Talk:Black_people#Removed_one_line_for_study Thulean 19:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The citation is for the genetic claim. Refuting Sforza is discussed in the talk page and without commenting on it, you again reverted the article. That's considered vandalism Thulean 19:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Removing cited information

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did at Black people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--Strothra 19:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

3RR

You have violated 3rr rule. You have reverted all or parts of the article more than 3 times in 24 hours. Please take your last revert back or I'll report you.Thulean 19:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Your request that I limit myself to one edit per day

What are the edits that you are objecting to, specifically. Most of what I have done in the last day have been spelling and punctuation errors. I have been surprised by the argumentative and dismissive edit summary you made, "(revert POV pushing by Patrick to last version by Halaqah, I've read Sforza & know what he said. Sigh, this was a good article a week ago)" It is generally not considered good practice to flame people in edit summaries.

You just made a negative comment saying, "You're not deleting anything," to my explanation for why I had replaced content that was valid that somebody had deleted. Read over what I said and note that I replaced the material you seem to think I want to delete. P0M 19:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)