Revision as of 02:39, 4 May 2019 editDannyS712 bot (talk | contribs)Bots129,386 editsm →ArbCom 2019 special circular: Task 8: Fix a mass message - add a timestamp - see Special:Permalink/895410426#The recent mass-message ...Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 4 May 2019 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,321 edits →Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular): new sectionTag: MassMessage deliveryNext edit → | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | <small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | ||
{{Z152}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | {{Z152}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
{{Z83}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> |
Revision as of 21:04, 4 May 2019
Archive
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU 11:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
News, reports and features from the English Misplaced Pages's weekly journal about Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Misplaced Pages SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Misplaced Pages's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Misplaced Pages just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Misplaced Pages community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
- Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy
ArbCom 2019 special circular
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z152
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z83