Misplaced Pages

User talk:Guarapiranga: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:12, 6 June 2019 editGuarapiranga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,889 edits June 2019: ReplyTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Revision as of 04:33, 6 June 2019 edit undoBegoon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,915 edits June 2019: Replying to Guarapiranga (using reply-link)Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
**I've started a discussion at that article as the graph problems there are identical. However, I've recommended that we maintain a single discussion at ] where we can work toward fixing the problems in both graphs at once. I've alerted {{u|Akld guy}} as the editor opposing the graph there. --] (]) 08:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC) **I've started a discussion at that article as the graph problems there are identical. However, I've recommended that we maintain a single discussion at ] where we can work toward fixing the problems in both graphs at once. I've alerted {{u|Akld guy}} as the editor opposing the graph there. --] (]) 08:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
] Did I start the war? No, I didn't. You emphasise using the Talk page, but did you use it to discuss the changes before reverting them? No, you didn't. ''"Good for thee, not for me"''? — ] (]) 04:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC) ] Did I start the war? No, I didn't. You emphasise using the Talk page, but did you use it to discuss the changes before reverting them? No, you didn't. ''"Good for thee, not for me"''? — ] (]) 04:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
:Please see my reply at ]. Thank you. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 04:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:33, 6 June 2019

June 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries and dependencies by population; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend () 07:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Guarapiranga, you seem to be edit-warring in a similar way at Jewish population by country. If you don't start using talk pages to get consensus when you are made aware that there is disagreement with your edits, and instead keep edit-warring (with or without the belligerent edit-summaries you've been using), you are likely to get yourself blocked. I'd hate to see that happen, so please listen to advice and alter your approach. Thank you. -- Begoon 07:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Did I start the war? No, I didn't. You emphasise using the Talk page, but did you use it to discuss the changes before reverting them? No, you didn't. "Good for thee, not for me"? — Guarapiranga (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Please see my reply at Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population#New graph. Thank you. -- Begoon 04:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)