Misplaced Pages

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:53, 27 November 2006 view sourceAtlant (talk | contribs)Administrators33,280 edits +NPOV. The lede paragraph, then the rest of the article is criticism? That's not NPOV.← Previous edit Revision as of 22:56, 27 November 2006 view source 65.54.155.47 (talk) From other commentatorsNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


:<nowiki></nowiki> use of the loaded word "apartheid," suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today "is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land.... Mr. Carter's book is so filled with simple mistakes of fact and deliberate omissions that were it a brief filed in a court of law, it would be struck and its author sanctioned for misleading the court. Mr. Carter too is guilty of misleading the court of public opinion." :<nowiki></nowiki> use of the loaded word "apartheid," suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today "is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land.... Mr. Carter's book is so filled with simple mistakes of fact and deliberate omissions that were it a brief filed in a court of law, it would be struck and its author sanctioned for misleading the court. Mr. Carter too is guilty of misleading the court of public opinion."

Dershowitz has a long history of partisan support for the Israeli government, regardless of administration, and its policies.


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 22:56, 27 November 2006

Graphic of a globe with a red analog clockThis article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Feel free to improve this article or discuss changes on the talk page, but please note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
File:Palestine peace not apartheid.jpg
Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the Israeli West Bank barrier, right

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is a book written by former President of the United States Jimmy Carter. It is being published by Simon & Schuster and released on 14 November 2006. The former president asserts in the book that Israel’s current policies in the Palestinian territories constitute “a system of apartheid, with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights.”

Criticism

Leading Democrats

In particular, Democrats distanced themselves from the former Democratic President's book prior to the November 2006 mid-term election.

On 30 October, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, and House Minority Leader and soon-to-be Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated that the book does not represent their views on the Israel.

“While I have tremendous respect for former President Carter, I fundamentally disagree and do not support his analysis of Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Dean's statement said. “On this issue President Carter speaks for himself, the opinions in his book are his own, they are not the views or position of the Democratic Party. I and other Democrats will continue to stand with Israel in its battle against terrorism and for a lasting peace with its neighbors.”

Pelosi wrote: "It is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously. With all due respect to former President Carter, he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel.”

U.S. Representatives Steve Israel, Charlie Rangel, Jerrold Nadler, and John Conyers, Jr. also released statements critical of the book. “I cannot agree with the book’s title and its implications about apartheid," Conyers wrote. "I recently called the former president to express my concerns about the title of the book, and to request that the title be changed.” Congressman Israel said, “The reason for the Palestinian plight is the Palestinians. Their leadership has no regard for the quality of life for their people and no capability of providing security or enforcing peace, and they have no one to blame but themselves.” He also added that the “book clearly does not reflect the direction of the party; it reflects the opinion of one man.”

Aaron Miller, a former State Department official who has consistently advocated a greater American role in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, said that Carter’s book would not influence key decision makers in the administration. But he added, “the one thing that I assure you is that Carter’s book will be read” by a wider audience.

From other commentators

Alan Dershowitz, professor of law at Harvard University and author of several books on the Arab-Israeli conflict, wrote in the New York Sun that:

use of the loaded word "apartheid," suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today "is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land.... Mr. Carter's book is so filled with simple mistakes of fact and deliberate omissions that were it a brief filed in a court of law, it would be struck and its author sanctioned for misleading the court. Mr. Carter too is guilty of misleading the court of public opinion."

Dershowitz has a long history of partisan support for the Israeli government, regardless of administration, and its policies.

See also

References

  1. ^ Siegel, Jennifer (27 October 2006). "Dems Repudiate Carter Book". Jewish Daily Forward. Retrieved 31 October. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
Stub icon

This article about a political book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: