Misplaced Pages

User talk:Molloy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:40, 3 January 2005 editHumus sapiens (talk | contribs)27,653 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 11:01, 3 January 2005 edit undoMolloy (talk | contribs)290 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


: This is the last time I'm writing to you. A Zionist Conference could not be in Budapest in 1952 because it was under pro-Soviet rule. The Soviets were fircely anti-Zionist. This is only the beginning, the rest of your text is full of similar crap. Check your sources and do some reading, including the article you are trying to butcher. ]←]←] 10:40, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) : This is the last time I'm writing to you. A Zionist Conference could not be in Budapest in 1952 because it was under pro-Soviet rule. The Soviets were fircely anti-Zionist. This is only the beginning, the rest of your text is full of similar crap. Check your sources and do some reading, including the article you are trying to butcher. ]←]←] 10:40, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

:: Your claims are luducrous, you claim a quote cannot exsist, by claiming the "era" did not suit the given subject matter? Even when faced with reputable sources proving my articles validity? Don't be ignorant. - Molloy

Revision as of 11:01, 3 January 2005

Inserting hate speech here is a speedy way to get banned. Humus sapiensTalk 10:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This is the last time I'm writing to you. A Zionist Conference could not be in Budapest in 1952 because it was under pro-Soviet rule. The Soviets were fircely anti-Zionist. This is only the beginning, the rest of your text is full of similar crap. Check your sources and do some reading, including the article you are trying to butcher. Humus sapiensTalk 10:40, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Your claims are luducrous, you claim a quote cannot exsist, by claiming the "era" did not suit the given subject matter? Even when faced with reputable sources proving my articles validity? Don't be ignorant. - Molloy