User talk:Reddragon7: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:07, 27 August 2019 editCNMall41 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers70,736 edits declined (AFCH 0.9.1)← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:52, 29 August 2019 edit undoReddragon7 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,156 edits →Your submission at Articles for creation: Techrock1 (August 27)Next edit →
Line 164:		Line 164:
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}
	] (]) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc reject-->		] (]) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc reject-->

			Thanks for dropping a comment about the mistakes in the article. You are absolutely right about BBC article not having a mention of Techrock in the article. However it mentions Walimai(which has been rebranded as Techrock now)As for the medium article it was used as a supporting reference. However now I do understand that it is against the Misplaced Pages policies and I will make sure to remove those in all future submissions.

			What do you think about the following article?

			https://www.businessinsider.sg/a-startup-is-using-blockchain-technology-to-tackle-counterfeit-milk-powder-heres-how/

			This is a full coverage article from Business Insider which does discuss about the company in very detail.--] (]) 02:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:52, 29 August 2019

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foodics (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. The comment the reviewer left was: Declining; as seen with in the revision log , no changes have been made since the last decline, and as such the (presumably) WP:NCORP concern raised by the previous reviewer has not been addressed. Also somewhat promotional in tone. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Foodics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Foodics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Reddragon7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Full compliance with WP:PAID

Hello Reddragon. I noted from your user page that you occasionally edit Misplaced Pages for compensation. This is allowed by Misplaced Pages policy, and you have thusfar done a good job disclosing your connections. However, note that on your userpage you must provide links to any and all off-wiki sites on which you advertise Misplaced Pages editing services, per Misplaced Pages:Paid-contribution disclosure. If applicable to you, please make the necessary links at your earliest possible convenience. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words. I always try to edit following Misplaced Pages policies. I will definitely add links here when I advertise my services on off Wiki sites.--Reddragon7 (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry Reddragon7, but it has been over a month since I started the thread above and you still have not made the required links on your userpage; please do so as soon as possible. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Following up on Sam's comments, this disclosure is not optional. If you do not comply with Misplaced Pages's Terms of Use, you will be blocked from editing. As well as linking to your off-wiki advertising, you also need to ensure that you declare your affiliation correctly; this requires that you indicate how you came to accept the job in question (via Fiverr, Upwork, Freelancer etc.). Again, this disclosure is not optional. You need to address these issues before you continue to edit here. Yunshui _水 11:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LetterPress Chocolate 1 (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LetterPress Chocolate 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LetterPress Chocolate 1, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jared Canon (August 1)

AfC notification: Draft:Experimental Farm Network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Experimental Farm Network. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bigredcloud (August 3)

AfC notification: Draft:Experimental Farm Network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Experimental Farm Network. Thanks! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gabriela Hersham has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gabriela Hersham. Thanks! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Harris (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Please see WP:REFBOMB and WP:THREE. Please use reliable sources that sufficiently support the claims, no more. None of the facts stated in the draft make a person inherently notable. Please make it clear what makes this subject notable and not run of the mill. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Harris, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ✨ 09:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MGC Pharmaceuticals has been accepted

MGC Pharmaceuticals, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

Lapablo (talk) 12:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriela Hersham (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriela Hersham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gabriela Hersham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Experimental Farm Network (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Experimental Farm Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Experimental Farm Network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agritask (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Declining; the sources cited do not seem to meet WP:NCORP's criteria for independent, non-trivial sources. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agritask and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Agritask, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anchorage (company) (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Declining; cites a number of sources, but none are particularly in-depth enough to meet WP:NCORP. Specifically, NCORP is clear that press releases, business and funding announcements do no constitute in-depth coverage and as such do not confer notability. In addition, unreliable sources like Medium and Crunchbase should be removed. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anchorage (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anchorage (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Techrock1 (August 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Advertorial and WP:REFBOMBING. This seems like an attempt to mask notability of the company. The second reference from BBC doesn't even mention the company. As a paid editor, I would expect that you adhere to Misplaced Pages standards better. You are also using sources like Medium and press releases which don't come close to meeting WP:ORGCRIT. Can you please provide a response as to why you did this? It seems like you may be WP:NOTHERE but would love to discuss prior to bringing in the community for an overall discussion. Maybe there is something you can point out that I am overlooking or exaggerating. CNMall41 (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for dropping a comment about the mistakes in the article. You are absolutely right about BBC article not having a mention of Techrock in the article. However it mentions Walimai(which has been rebranded as Techrock now)As for the medium article it was used as a supporting reference. However now I do understand that it is against the Misplaced Pages policies and I will make sure to remove those in all future submissions.

What do you think about the following article?

https://www.businessinsider.sg/a-startup-is-using-blockchain-technology-to-tackle-counterfeit-milk-powder-heres-how/

This is a full coverage article from Business Insider which does discuss about the company in very detail.--Reddragon7 (talk) 02:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)