| Revision as of 15:38, 29 August 2019 editDoremo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users124,084 editsm →Recent additions: typo← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:14, 30 September 2019 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,802 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Slovenia/Archive 1) (botNext edit → |
| Line 54: |
Line 54: |
|
|
|
|
|
–– <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:18 9 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|
–– <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:18 9 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
== Recent additions == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the recent additions by the user Realslovenian. In addition to no sources being cited, the material was largely inaccurate and/or unencyclopedic. Among other things: 1) "massive emigration" does not cause population growth and is not in the source cited; 2) Slovenian is not an "ancient language," the dual is not "a complex phenonenon" and does not pervade all aspects of the language, the dialects vary in distinctiveness and how many are reckoned, clarity/understandability are subjective, Slovenian has no vocative; and 3) phrases like "slew of" are unencyclopedic and English capitalizes proper nouns and adjectives. All of these issues are covered more accurately at the appertaining articles. ] (]) 11:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Proposition on Georgraphical change on google search == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi , as you might be aware Slovenia is under google search as "Country in the Balkans" , however historically and culturally many people would disagree. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we look at Scandinavian countries and Baltic ones, all of them say 'Country in Europe' when searched on google, therefore not specialised. |
|
|
I propose to change it to 'Country in Europe' as it is more accurante, and other balkan countries are not... It was so around 1 year ago, and culturally speaking the majority of slovenians would also view this as more correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
Let me know what you think. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
email: factsnews24@gmail.com <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
: Misplaced Pages is not a place to discuss what happens in google search. --''']''' 14:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC) |
|
Foreign Office (i.e. British civil authority, but not the military) policy was indeed initially, as you say, in favor of 'hand-over' of the Italian war criminals, but the British and American military authorities in Italy were against it (p.520), but the Foreign Office changed its policy (ibid., p.523), too, when in 1946 the possibility was that Italian communists would win the Italian general election, which would open Italy to Soviet influence, so they decided to drop the case and let Italy do the job (ibid., p.526) resulting in the (highly indicative) fate of Graziani and Roatta (ibid., p.525). The British concern to secure the electoral victory of the Christian Democrats "prompted Britain to drop all of its war crimes claims against Italy" (ibid., p.527). See the screenshots from the scholarly article via JStor.org
