Revision as of 13:36, 15 September 2019 editCptViraj (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,433 edits Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G13).← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 15 September 2019 edit undoHut 8.5 (talk | contribs)Administrators62,802 edits restoration requested at WP:REFUND, does not qualify for G13 as Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Operational Chow ring not closed as DeleteNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-afc|ts=2019-03-12T10:24:28Z|help=off}} | |||
{{mfd-mergeto|Chow group|Draft:Operational Chow ring|9 March 2018|Talk:Chow group}} | {{mfd-mergeto|Chow group|Draft:Operational Chow ring|9 March 2018|Talk:Chow group}} | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 15 September 2019
This page was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 9 March 2018 with a consensus to merge the content into the page Chow group. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the page for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination page's talk page. |
The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:
If X is smooth, such a map exists since is the usual Chow ring of X. (Totaro 2014) harv error: no target: CITEREFTotaro2014 (help) has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky’s motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)
References
- W. Fulton, R. MacPherson, F. Sottile, and B. Sturmfels, ‘Intersection theory on spherical varieties’, J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 181–193.
- Totaro, Chow groups, Chow cohomology and linear varieties
This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |