Revision as of 15:22, 25 September 2019 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 editsm Protected "Draft:Operational Chow ring": Edit warring / content dispute ( (expires 15:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)) (expires 15:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)))← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:23, 25 September 2019 edit undoEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 editsm {{pp-dispute|small=yes}}Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp-dispute|small=yes}} | |||
{{mfd-mergeto|Chow group|Draft:Operational Chow ring|9 March 2018|Talk:Chow group}} | {{mfd-mergeto|Chow group|Draft:Operational Chow ring|9 March 2018|Talk:Chow group}} | ||
Revision as of 15:23, 25 September 2019
This page was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 9 March 2018 with a consensus to merge the content into the page Chow group. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the page for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination page's talk page. |
The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:
If X is smooth, such a map exists since is the usual Chow ring of X. (Totaro 2014) harv error: no target: CITEREFTotaro2014 (help) has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky’s motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)
References
- W. Fulton, R. MacPherson, F. Sottile, and B. Sturmfels, ‘Intersection theory on spherical varieties’, J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 181–193.
- Totaro, Chow groups, Chow cohomology and linear varieties
This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |