| Revision as of 14:15, 31 October 2019 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits Archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:54, 3 November 2019 edit undoRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits ArhiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ::Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --] (]) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC) | ::Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --] (]) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Agreed. - ] (]) 13:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | ::: Agreed. - ] (]) 13:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == ArbCom: Disputes at ] == | |||
| I thought you may want to know that Curly Turkey has started an an extension of the ANI. I will comment there when I have time, but I wanted to make sure you are aware as Curly has not notified all parties.--] (]) 02:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for the notification. - ] (]) 15:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:54, 3 November 2019
Archive 12 (2019)
Please Leave comments below
Hello! c: --NikkeKatski (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, you played a role in my "Keep" - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --NikkeKatski (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --NikkeKatski (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom: Disputes at SNC-Lavalin affair
I thought you may want to know that Curly Turkey has started an ArbCom request here an extension of the ANI. I will comment there when I have time, but I wanted to make sure you are aware as Curly has not notified all parties.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)