Misplaced Pages

Votebank: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:56, 14 November 2019 editUnreal7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users207,013 edits →BibliographyTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Revision as of 10:32, 2 May 2020 edit undoAustronesier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,238 edits Specify context. Per MOS, "refers to"-definitions should be avoided, but since the term is in itself a rhetorical device, I think this way of defining the topic is apt here.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EngvarB|date=January 2019}}{{Short description|Type of voting block on ethnic or identity lines}}A '''votebank''' (also spelled '''vote-bank''' or '''vote bank''') is a loyal ] of ] from a single ], who consistently back a certain ] or political formation in ] ]. Such behaviour is often the result of an expectation of real or imagined benefits from the political formations, often at the cost of other communities. Votebank politics is the practice of creating and maintaining votebanks through divisive policies. As it encourages voters to vote on the basis of narrow communal considerations, often against their better judgement, it is considered harmful to the principles of ].{{By whom|date=January 2019}} {{EngvarB|date=January 2019}}{{Short description|Type of voting block on ethnic or identity lines}}
In the ], the term '''votebank''' (also spelled '''vote-bank''' or '''vote bank''') refers to a loyal ] of ] from a single ], who consistently back a certain ] or political formation in ] ]. Such behaviour is often the result of an expectation of real or imagined benefits from the political formations, often at the cost of other communities. Votebank politics is the practice of creating and maintaining votebanks through divisive policies. As it encourages voters to vote on the basis of narrow communal considerations, often against their better judgement, it is considered harmful to the principles of ].{{By whom|date=January 2019}}


==Etymology== ==Etymology==

Revision as of 10:32, 2 May 2020

Type of voting block on ethnic or identity lines

In the political discourse of India, the term votebank (also spelled vote-bank or vote bank) refers to a loyal bloc of voters from a single community, who consistently back a certain candidate or political formation in democratic elections. Such behaviour is often the result of an expectation of real or imagined benefits from the political formations, often at the cost of other communities. Votebank politics is the practice of creating and maintaining votebanks through divisive policies. As it encourages voters to vote on the basis of narrow communal considerations, often against their better judgement, it is considered harmful to the principles of representative democracy.

Etymology

The term vote-bank was first used by noted Indian sociologist, M. N. Srinivas (who also coined the terms Sanskritisation and dominant caste), in his 1955 paper entitled The Social System of a Mysore Village. He used it in the context of political influence exerted by a patron over a client. Later, the expression was used by F. G. Bailey, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, San Diego, in his 1959 book Politics and Social Change, to refer to the electoral influence of the caste leader. This is the usage that has since become popular.

Examples

Some of the first identified votebanks were along caste lines. Others based on other community characteristics, such as religion and language, have also occurred. Votebanks are generally considered undesirable in electoral politics. For example, Thapar (2013) argues that votebanks based on either caste or religion stand in the way of secularisation. Katju (2011) identifies accusations of votebanking as a rhetorical tool used by Hindu nationalists in complaints about special rights or privileges granted to non-Hindus in India. Other examples include:

  • In 1989, the Badaga people of South India petitioned the Indian government to be recognized as an official tribe, demonstrating en masse on 15 May of that year to imply the strength of the Badaga votebank.
  • India's Left Front party historically has solid support in rural West Bengal.

See also

References

  1. Grillo (2000). sfnp error: no target: CITEREFGrillo2000 (help)
  2. Srinivas (1955).
  3. Bailey (1959).
  4. Heidemann (2014), p. 96.
  5. Basu (2007), p. 301.

Bibliography

  • Bailey, F. G. (1959), Politics and Social Change, Berkeley: University of California Press
  • Basu, Partha (2007), ""Brand Buddha" in India's West Bengal: The Left Reinvents Itself", Asian Survey, 47 (2): 288–306, doi:10.1525/as.2007.47.2.288
  • Grillo, Ralph; Needham, Rodney (2000), "Obituary: M. N. Srinivas", Anthropology Today, 16 (1): 22, doi:10.1111/1467-8322.00007, ISSN 0268-540X, JSTOR 2678199
  • Heidemann, Frank (2014), "Objectification and Social Aesthetics: Memoranda and the Celebration of "Badaga Day"", Asian Ethnology, 73 (1/2): 91–109
  • Katju, Manjari (2011), "The Understanding of Freedom in Hindutva", Social Scientist, 39 (3/4): 3–22
  • Srinivas, M. N. (1955), "The Social System of a Mysore Village", in Marriott, McKim (ed.), Village India: studies in the little community, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–35
  • Thapar, Romila (2013), "The Secular Mode for India", Social Scientist, 41 (11/12): 3–10
  • Shourie, Arun (2012). Falling over backwards: An essay on reservations and judicial populism. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 978-9350293553

External links

Categories: