Misplaced Pages

OpIndia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:36, 4 January 2020 view source2409:4052:2e11:3028:c656:5260:2762:ff6c (talk) Fixed the content, it was misleadingTags: section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Revision as of 09:38, 4 January 2020 view source Winged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,041 edits Undid revision 934025291 by 2409:4052:2E11:3028:C656:5260:2762:FF6C (talk) (mobileUndo)Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


Later, it was disassociated from the group and became a separate entity<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opindia.com/2018/11/announcement-opindia-is-now-a-separate-legal-and-business-entity/|title=Announcement: OpIndia is now a separate legal and business entity - Opindia News|last=Roushan|first=Rahul|date=2018-11-23|website=OpIndia|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-11-30}}</ref>; Nupur J Sharma is the current editor.<ref name=":2" /> Later, it was disassociated from the group and became a separate entity<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opindia.com/2018/11/announcement-opindia-is-now-a-separate-legal-and-business-entity/|title=Announcement: OpIndia is now a separate legal and business entity - Opindia News|last=Roushan|first=Rahul|date=2018-11-23|website=OpIndia|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-11-30}}</ref>; Nupur J Sharma is the current editor.<ref name=":2" />

== Content and reception ==
] has documented the site to be a significant purveyor of fake news, in India.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.altnews.in/search/OpIndia/|title=Search results for OpIndia|website=]|language=en-GB|url-status=live|access-date=10 November 2019}}</ref>

A January 2020 report by the media watchdog Newslaundry noted the portal to contain several inflammatory headlines selectively targeting the ], ] and Muslims.<ref name=":0">{{cite news|url=https://www.newslaundry.com/2020/01/03/fake-news-lies-muslim-bashing-and-ravish-kumar-inside-opindias-harrowing-world|title=Fake news, lies, Muslim bashing, and Ravish Kumar: Inside OpIndia’s harrowing world|last=Kumar|first=Basant|date=3 January 2020|work=Newslaundry|accessdate=3 January 2020|language=en-UK}}</ref> ] was noted to be a dominant theme, achieved either by selective manipulation or outright faking.<ref name=":0" /> The political opposition (esp. ]) and ] was a favorite target of their vitriol; posts published by ''OpIndia'' ''Hindi'' from November 15 to 29 were located to be invariably situated against any criticism of the ] ].<ref name=":0" /> Most of the pieces contained brazenly abusive commentary on the subjects.<ref name=":0" />

In May 2019, the ] (IFCN), an affiliate of the Poynter Institute, rejected OpIndia's application to be accredited as a fact-checker;<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/can-fact-checking-emerge-as-big-and-viable-business/articleshow/69210719.cms|title=Can fact-checking emerge as big and viable business?|last=Ananth|first=Venkat|date=2019-05-07|work=The Economic Times|access-date=10 November 2019}}</ref> among a variety of reasons, it noted political partisanism, poor fact-checking methodologies and general polemic commentary accompanying their news-pieces as significant contributors towards the rejection.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/application/public/opindiacom/EED18C9F-C8B2-258A-BB43-7E90FA57C26C|title=Conclusions and recommendations on the application by OpIndia.com|last=Kaur|first=Kanchan|date=11 February 2019|website=International Fact-Checking Network|url-status=unfit|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190310013235/https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/application/public/opindiacom/EED18C9F-C8B2-258A-BB43-7E90FA57C26C|archive-date=10 March 2019|access-date=12 December 2019}}</ref> The rejection disqualified OpIndia for fact-checking contracts with web properties owned by ] and ].<ref name="ET IFCN">{{cite news|first1=Venkat|last1=Ananth|accessdate=2019-12-12|title=Can fact-checking emerge as big and viable business?|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/can-fact-checking-emerge-as-big-and-viable-business/articleshow/69210719.cms|newspaper=]|date=7 May 2019}}</ref>


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 09:38, 4 January 2020

Right wing Indian news portal
OpIndia
OpIndia logo
Type of siteNews
Available inEnglish, Hindi
OwnerAadhyaasi Media And Content Services
URLwww.opindia.com
Right wing Indian news portal

OpIndia is an Indian news portal which claims to be a fact-checking website. It is ideologically oriented towards right-wing populism and has propagated fake news over multiple occasions.

History

OpIndia was founded in 2014 by Rahul Raj and Kumar Kamal as a current affairs and news website. In October 2016, it was acquired by Kovai Media Private Limited, a Coimbatore-based company of T. V. Mohandas Pai, that also owns the right-leaning magazine Swarajya.

Later, it was disassociated from the group and became a separate entity; Nupur J Sharma is the current editor.

Content and reception

AltNews has documented the site to be a significant purveyor of fake news, in India.

A January 2020 report by the media watchdog Newslaundry noted the portal to contain several inflammatory headlines selectively targeting the leftists, liberals and Muslims. Islamophobia was noted to be a dominant theme, achieved either by selective manipulation or outright faking. The political opposition (esp. Indian National Congress) and mainstream media was a favorite target of their vitriol; posts published by OpIndia Hindi from November 15 to 29 were located to be invariably situated against any criticism of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. Most of the pieces contained brazenly abusive commentary on the subjects.

In May 2019, the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), an affiliate of the Poynter Institute, rejected OpIndia's application to be accredited as a fact-checker; among a variety of reasons, it noted political partisanism, poor fact-checking methodologies and general polemic commentary accompanying their news-pieces as significant contributors towards the rejection. The rejection disqualified OpIndia for fact-checking contracts with web properties owned by Facebook and Google.

References

  1. Bhushan/TheWire, Sandeep (2017-01-26). "Arnab's Republic hints at mainstreaming right-wing opinion as a business". Business Standard India. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  2. Sources supporting OpIndia to follow a right wing ideology:
  3. Sources supporting OpIndia to have disseminated fake news:
  4. ^ Manish, Sai (2018-04-07). "Right vs Wrong: Arundhati Roy, Mohandas Pai funding fake news busters". Business Standard India. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  5. Roushan, Rahul (2018-11-23). "Announcement: OpIndia is now a separate legal and business entity - Opindia News". OpIndia. Retrieved 2019-11-30.
  6. "Search results for OpIndia". Alt News. Retrieved 10 November 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ Kumar, Basant (3 January 2020). "Fake news, lies, Muslim bashing, and Ravish Kumar: Inside OpIndia's harrowing world". Newslaundry. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
  8. Ananth, Venkat (2019-05-07). "Can fact-checking emerge as big and viable business?". The Economic Times. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  9. Kaur, Kanchan (11 February 2019). "Conclusions and recommendations on the application by OpIndia.com". International Fact-Checking Network. Archived from the original on 10 March 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2019.
  10. Ananth, Venkat (7 May 2019). "Can fact-checking emerge as big and viable business?". The Economic Times. Retrieved 2019-12-12.
Categories: