Misplaced Pages

Talk:Montenegro: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:09, 10 January 2020 editKrakkos (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers23,569 edits Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 12:58, 23 January 2020 edit undoSadko (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers81,731 edits Removal of text and sources: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 43: Line 43:


It is currently being proposed that ] be deleted. This article is part of that category. The relevant discussion is located at ]. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Montenegro. ] (]) 11:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC) It is currently being proposed that ] be deleted. This article is part of that category. The relevant discussion is located at ]. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Montenegro. ] (]) 11:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

== Removal of text and sources ==

{{ping|J. M.}} {{ping|Bassball Batman}} {{ping|Khirurg}} {{ping|Hazhk}} {{ping|DerTorx}} {{ping|Amanuensis Balkanicus}} {{ping|Theo Moraes Teixeira}} I am pinging several editors who worked on the page in the last month or so. As you can see a number of sources were removed, the part which describes how some priests were attacked have been removed as well. (in the ''Politika'' article the man who was attacked talks about it). The part which states that this law applies not only to church building but to estates as well, has also been removed. This law applies to all the property of the Serbian Orthodox Church. We had something similar in the Balkans in the Communist era. The part which described protest as massive has also been removed. According to local news sources around 100.000 protested (which is 1/6 of the country!).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.danas.rs/svet/vise-hiljada-ljudi-protestvovalo-u-podgorici-protiv-zakona-o-veroispovesti/|title=Više hiljada ljudi protestovalo u Podgorici protiv Zakona o veroispovesti|last=Beta|first=Piše:|date=2020-01-01|website=Dnevni list Danas|language=sr-RS|access-date=2020-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2020&mm=01&dd=01&nav_category=167&nav_id=1637197|title=Crkvene pesme, ikone, ori se "Ne damo svetinje" - protesti širom Crne Gore ne prestaju FOTO/VIDEO|website=B92.net|language=sr-Latn-RS|access-date=2020-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nedeljnik.rs/protesti-sirom-crne-gore-ne-prestaju-molebani-setnje-i-povici-ne-damo-svetinje/|title=Protesti širom Crne Gore ne prestaju: Molebani, šetnje i povici "Ne damo svetinje"|last=Nedeljnik.rs|date=2020-01-02|website=Nedeljnik|language=en-US|access-date=2020-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dnevno.rs/ufokusu/protesti-sirom-crne-gore-ne-prestaju-hiljade-ljudi-na-ulicama-podgorice-orilo-se-ne-damo-svetinje-fotovideo/|title=PROTESTI ŠIROM CRNE GORE NE PRESTAJU! Hiljade ljudi na ulicama Podgorice, orilo se “NE DAMO SVETINJE” (FOTO+VIDEO) {{!}} Dnevno.rs|last=Aleksandra Bogdanović|date=2020-01-02|website=www.dnevno.rs|language=hr|access-date=2020-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://trebinjelive.info/2020/01/04/cijeli-herceg-novi-stao-u-odbranu-svetinja-na-molebanima-sirom-crne-gore-100-000-ljudi/|title=Cijeli Herceg-Novi stao u odbranu svetinja - Na molebanima širom Crne Gore 100.000 ljudi {{!}} Trebinje Live|website=TrebinjeLive.info|language=sr|access-date=2020-01-23}}</ref> I seek help and mediation, as I think that we have a POV pushing and ] taking place. The whole "fake news" diff (reminds me of someone's tweets) was not explained. Thank you, ''']''' ] 12:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:58, 23 January 2020

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Montenegro article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting, and read through the list of highlighted discussions below before starting a new one:

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Former featured article candidateMontenegro is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 12, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMontenegro Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCountries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconYugoslavia High‑importance
WikiProject iconMontenegro is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Misplaced Pages coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEastern Europe (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe
Template:WP1.0

Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories

It is currently being proposed that Category:Slavic countries and territories be deleted. This article is part of that category. The relevant discussion is located at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Countries and territories by language family. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Montenegro. Krakkos (talk) 11:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Removal of text and sources

@J. M.: @Bassball Batman: @Khirurg: @Hazhk: @DerTorx: @Amanuensis Balkanicus: @Theo Moraes Teixeira: I am pinging several editors who worked on the page in the last month or so. As you can see a number of sources were removed, the part which describes how some priests were attacked have been removed as well. (in the Politika article the man who was attacked talks about it). The part which states that this law applies not only to church building but to estates as well, has also been removed. This law applies to all the property of the Serbian Orthodox Church. We had something similar in the Balkans in the Communist era. The part which described protest as massive has also been removed. According to local news sources around 100.000 protested (which is 1/6 of the country!). I seek help and mediation, as I think that we have a POV pushing and Misplaced Pages:I just don't like it taking place. The whole "fake news" diff (reminds me of someone's tweets) was not explained. Thank you, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

  1. Beta, Piše: (2020-01-01). "Više hiljada ljudi protestovalo u Podgorici protiv Zakona o veroispovesti". Dnevni list Danas (in Serbian). Retrieved 2020-01-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  2. "Crkvene pesme, ikone, ori se "Ne damo svetinje" - protesti širom Crne Gore ne prestaju FOTO/VIDEO". B92.net (in Serbian). Retrieved 2020-01-23.
  3. Nedeljnik.rs (2020-01-02). "Protesti širom Crne Gore ne prestaju: Molebani, šetnje i povici "Ne damo svetinje"". Nedeljnik. Retrieved 2020-01-23.
  4. Aleksandra Bogdanović (2020-01-02). "PROTESTI ŠIROM CRNE GORE NE PRESTAJU! Hiljade ljudi na ulicama Podgorice, orilo se "NE DAMO SVETINJE" (FOTO+VIDEO) | Dnevno.rs". www.dnevno.rs (in Croatian). Retrieved 2020-01-23.
  5. "Cijeli Herceg-Novi stao u odbranu svetinja - Na molebanima širom Crne Gore 100.000 ljudi | Trebinje Live". TrebinjeLive.info (in Serbian). Retrieved 2020-01-23.
Categories: