| Revision as of 20:56, 11 December 2006 editChaser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,935 edits reply to Curse of Fenric← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:46, 11 December 2006 edit undoRavenswing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,985 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Delete''' ] 11:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' ] 11:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom/above. As a side note, second AfD i've seen ] attack nominator instead of addressing the deletion debate. /] 17:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom/above. As a side note, second AfD i've seen ] attack nominator instead of addressing the deletion debate. /] 17:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Possibly the Googlers should have tried UK Google, which has a number of more hits . It's registered with Dun & Bradstreet , not the usual habit of indy feds. ] 21:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 11 December 2006
Wrestle Zone Wrestling
non-notable wrestling promotion, fails WP:CORP and WP:V BooyakaDell 01:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Major UK promotion, one of the largest drawing ones. Far outdraws many American promotions, which curiously aren't nominated for deletion. Which parts of the article need verifying? 81.155.178.248 02:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- All of it. MER-C 03:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - "Wrestle Zone Wrestling (wZw) is a small professional wrestling promotion", could only find one non-trivial mention which seems like a reprinted press release. Fails WP:CORP. MER-C 03:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. --Mhking 04:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Numerous edits have failed to improve this page from being a self-promotional article.Mmoneypenny 05:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nomination made in bad faith. Nominator under investigation for vandalism. Curse of Fenric 06:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since this doesn't fall under one of the reasons listed at WP:SK and you're currently in a mediation with the nominator, can we please stop the accusations of bad faith and respond to the nomination itself? That three AfD regulars have agreed with the nom before you made this claim does not help your case.--Kchase T 09:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The mediation is over and has failed. This nomination is a threat to the database of UK indepedant wrestling, and should be removed ASAP. I am stating facts that back up said accusations. Curse of Fenric 20:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why don't you try again to respond to some of the points made in the nomination. Whatever your feelings about the nominator, he's making valid points, and you have yet to respond to them.--Kchase T 20:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The mediation is over and has failed. This nomination is a threat to the database of UK indepedant wrestling, and should be removed ASAP. I am stating facts that back up said accusations. Curse of Fenric 20:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since this doesn't fall under one of the reasons listed at WP:SK and you're currently in a mediation with the nominator, can we please stop the accusations of bad faith and respond to the nomination itself? That three AfD regulars have agreed with the nom before you made this claim does not help your case.--Kchase T 09:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom/above. As a side note, second AfD i've seen User:Curse of Fenric attack nominator instead of addressing the deletion debate. /Blaxthos 17:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Possibly the Googlers should have tried UK Google, which has a number of more hits . It's registered with Dun & Bradstreet , not the usual habit of indy feds. RGTraynor 21:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)