| Revision as of 09:24, 30 January 2020 editFrankBierFarmer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users638 edits →January 2020: accusation by a group of users ... please stay calm← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:43, 30 January 2020 edit undoCambial Yellowing (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,160 editsm rm crass attempt at WP:SANCTIONGAMINGNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| Really? ] (]) 21:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC) | Really? ] (]) 21:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2020 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}''You are explicitly edit warring here per your edit summary. You also appear to be attempting to preempt discussion, which is the exact opposite of what you should have done is you disagreed with the exclusion of the proposed content.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Cambial_Yellowing .. | |||
| your actions are not wellcomed, your words are not mentioned. Please note the actions, and who accused you to be a wiki- perpetrator. Stay calm please. Truth will revert itself. At least in 50 years, when the archives will be opened of the OPCW, and military adminstrations of DOD, Britain and France. | |||
| ] (]) 09:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:43, 30 January 2020
Invitation to WikiProject Reliability
|
Hi, Cambial Yellowing! Thanks for ensuring that articles are supported by reliable sources. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Misplaced Pages articles. If you would like to participate, please visit WikiProject Reliability for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! — Newslinger talk 07:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC) |
Name
hey, how do you do that to your name? I've also seen others with colourful or artistic name designs but I have no idea how it's done. Thanks man Nate Hooper (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Cambial Yellowing! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Aphex Twin
Hi, you’ve made some very helpful changes to the lead, but your insistence on including a tiny label that is rarely (if ever) mentioned in overviews of James's career (and not even naming it, implicitly admitting that it’s not significant enough to mention!) is inane. He recorded for several other labels during that time too, and you’ve not bothered to mention those—rightly, because it’d be silly. Include those details in the article body. gentlecollapse6 (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Clearly, Gentlecollapse6 we differ on this. Fine. Your presumption of ownership, however, is not appropriate, and neither is pretending to be making accusations of edit warring while in fact actively instigating an edit war yourself. Do not do this again. The appropriate place to discuss content disputes is generally the article talk page. It will be helpful in discussion if you refrain from seeking to dictate what is "compromise". I.e. in this case: I think a brief mention of how artist emerged from free party scene and gained fame/recognition is at least as notable as an "inane" recounting of which aliases he was recording under in which years, when he signed to Warp etc, and hence should be included in the lead. You do not. Not including it is not compromise. I suggest you respond on the article talk page. Cambial Yellowing❧ 01:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aphex Twin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orbital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Really?
Really? VQuakr (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)