| Revision as of 15:11, 30 January 2020 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits alertTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:44, 3 February 2020 edit undoDoc James (talk | contribs)Administrators312,283 edits Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 15:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 15:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2020 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (] · ] · ]) 04:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:44, 3 February 2020
Fischer Random Chess
Hi -- thanks for updating the name of the variant to "Fischer Random Chess" at FIDE World Fischer Random Chess Championship 2019 after the corresponding page was moved. There's still one instance of "Chess960" left in the article (in the section Semifinals and finals) -- did you leave that in on purpose because the name "Fischer Random Chess" wasn't official yet at the time? While many articles published at the time call it the Chess960 championship, note that on the poster behind Magnus and Hikaru in the photos in this article it already says "Fischer Random".
The same question also arises with respect to the article on the World Chess960 Championship (which is both about the previous unofficial championships, including the one in 2018, and about the FIDE World Fischer Random Chess Championship 2019).
Joriki (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I left it like that because I wasn't sure how to handle it. Feel free to do what you feel is correct. (KristofferR (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC))
DS alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Electronic cigarette topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 QuackGuru (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)