| Revision as of 14:08, 13 December 2006 editHassanfarooqi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,189 edits →Ahmad Sirhindi page← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:35, 21 December 2006 edit undoGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits →I'm confusedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Cheers! -- ] 21:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | Cheers! -- ] 21:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Your email reply to my message was caught by my spam filter. And I only read it today. I am going to reproduce your email here: | |||
| ::''"Thanks for your response about my editing of yours own user page actually if you abuse some one what he will do can you imagine it he will definately slap you if he has power or authority and you are spreading hatred in your own page thats why i edited it thats not the place of spreading hatred my dear. this encyclopedia is for peace not for hatred." | |||
| :First off, I dispute I am "spreading hatred". Why the heck would you assume that by starting ] I endorsed those allegations? I want the wikipedia's coverage of those organizations to be comprehensive enough, and written from the wikipedia's ], that readers can form their own opinion as to whether those allegations are credible. Remember, you should ]. | |||
| :Second -- I believe you are way off-base to be editing my working pages, based on leaping to the (wrong) conclusion as to my views and my goals. I suggest if you come across someone else's sub-pages in their user space that triggers a concern on your part that you '''ask''' them civil questions first, on their dedicated talk page, to determine if they really were "spreading hatred". If you are civil, and you ask questions first, then no harm done. If their reply confirms they are spreading hatred, then it would be better to draw the attention of one or more[REDACTED] administrators to their admission of spreading hatred, because that would be a serious enough breach to get them kicked off the wikipedia. | |||
| :Third -- I suggest you refrain from addressing people as "my dear". I anticipate that other people will be left with the impression I was left with -- that you may have '''intended''' to be patronizing. If your use of this phrase was not '''meant''' to be patronizing -- was merely careless -- then you are imposing a large, and unnecessary burden on your correspondents. Yes, your correspondents should be ], but it is thoughtless to sprinkle your writing with things you could easily realize would give the appearance of insults. | |||
| :Fourth -- for some reason there is a sub-set of those who disagree with me, or think they disagree with me, who try to put down my views based on the assumption that I am a female. Putting down someone's views based on an assumption about their gender isn't very admirable. I don't know whether your "my dear" comment was a sign '''you''' were trying to denigrate what you imagined my views were, based on what you imagined my gender to be -- or whether you merely have an idiosyncratic manner of expressing yourself. Either way I suggest you consider making an effort to drop this phrase, except for people who are already your friends. -- ] 01:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Ahmad Sirhindi page == | == Ahmad Sirhindi page == | ||
Revision as of 01:35, 21 December 2006
I'm confused
I'm confused. You made these edits to User:Geo Swan/working/Alleged terrorist organizations with which Guantanamo detainees are accused of association.
Usually[REDACTED] contributors don't edit the private working notes other contributors use for their rough work. I'm confused why you did so in this case.
Cheers! -- Geo Swan 21:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Your email reply to my message was caught by my spam filter. And I only read it today. I am going to reproduce your email here:
- "Thanks for your response about my editing of yours own user page actually if you abuse some one what he will do can you imagine it he will definately slap you if he has power or authority and you are spreading hatred in your own page thats why i edited it thats not the place of spreading hatred my dear. this encyclopedia is for peace not for hatred."
- First off, I dispute I am "spreading hatred". Why the heck would you assume that by starting User:Geo Swan/working/Alleged terrorist organizations with which Guantanamo detainees are accused of association I endorsed those allegations? I want the wikipedia's coverage of those organizations to be comprehensive enough, and written from the wikipedia's neutral point of view, that readers can form their own opinion as to whether those allegations are credible. Remember, you should assume good faith.
- Second -- I believe you are way off-base to be editing my working pages, based on leaping to the (wrong) conclusion as to my views and my goals. I suggest if you come across someone else's sub-pages in their user space that triggers a concern on your part that you ask them civil questions first, on their dedicated talk page, to determine if they really were "spreading hatred". If you are civil, and you ask questions first, then no harm done. If their reply confirms they are spreading hatred, then it would be better to draw the attention of one or more[REDACTED] administrators to their admission of spreading hatred, because that would be a serious enough breach to get them kicked off the wikipedia.
- Third -- I suggest you refrain from addressing people as "my dear". I anticipate that other people will be left with the impression I was left with -- that you may have intended to be patronizing. If your use of this phrase was not meant to be patronizing -- was merely careless -- then you are imposing a large, and unnecessary burden on your correspondents. Yes, your correspondents should be assuming good faith, but it is thoughtless to sprinkle your writing with things you could easily realize would give the appearance of insults.
- Fourth -- for some reason there is a sub-set of those who disagree with me, or think they disagree with me, who try to put down my views based on the assumption that I am a female. Putting down someone's views based on an assumption about their gender isn't very admirable. I don't know whether your "my dear" comment was a sign you were trying to denigrate what you imagined my views were, based on what you imagined my gender to be -- or whether you merely have an idiosyncratic manner of expressing yourself. Either way I suggest you consider making an effort to drop this phrase, except for people who are already your friends. -- Geo Swan 01:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Ahmad Sirhindi page
Hello! The images on the page have a dangerous status, they will be deleted soon. Did you add and/or take the pictures? Do you know the person who added/took the pictures? If so please prevent them from being deleted. --Suleyman Habeeb 17:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)