| Revision as of 09:00, 21 March 2020 editThe Drover's Wife (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers42,654 edits →Heading← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:10, 21 March 2020 edit undoSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,595 edits →HastieNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| It's good to see you taking an interest in that one - that editor is well-intentioned but needs some more direction to tone down the opinionated mess. Hastie is a complicated guy and trying to fine-tune detailed prose on topics like that is absolutely not my forte so it's nice to see someone stepping up. ] (]) 09:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC) | It's good to see you taking an interest in that one - that editor is well-intentioned but needs some more direction to tone down the opinionated mess. Hastie is a complicated guy and trying to fine-tune detailed prose on topics like that is absolutely not my forte so it's nice to see someone stepping up. ] (]) 09:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| :Humph. The article looks pretty horrible, TBH. Sourcing is kind of okay, but whether our text matches what is claimed in the sources is another matter. Hansard should be used very sparingly, otherwise what the MP says gets cherry-picked and reinterpreted, and the editor thinks they've got some ironclad authority. Hansard just records what the MP says, in all its opinionated glory. What we should have, for NPOV purposes, is for each sentence to have three sources. ''Guardian'', ''Australian'', and ''SMH''. --] (]) 09:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:10, 21 March 2020
Heading
Dear Pete / SkyRing If I'm breaking another rule inadvertently my apologies. I just wanted to make sure that you are aware that I provided a response to your offer of assistance. I'd be most appreciative if you could help me end up with a more accurate and complete entry. Thank you Edit0695 (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Pretends to know about Australian art by making edits about Australian artists that were actually made by Australian artists that found those artists notable within their particular genres. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.107.80 (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Hastie
It's good to see you taking an interest in that one - that editor is well-intentioned but needs some more direction to tone down the opinionated mess. Hastie is a complicated guy and trying to fine-tune detailed prose on topics like that is absolutely not my forte so it's nice to see someone stepping up. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Humph. The article looks pretty horrible, TBH. Sourcing is kind of okay, but whether our text matches what is claimed in the sources is another matter. Hansard should be used very sparingly, otherwise what the MP says gets cherry-picked and reinterpreted, and the editor thinks they've got some ironclad authority. Hansard just records what the MP says, in all its opinionated glory. What we should have, for NPOV purposes, is for each sentence to have three sources. Guardian, Australian, and SMH. --Pete (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)