Talk:Dakshina Kannada: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:56, 27 May 2020 editDicklyon (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers477,084 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Dicklyon (talk): Self revert; not the caps at issue (TW)Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:16, 27 May 2020 edit undoMSGJ (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators131,094 edits →Requested move 4 May 2020: closeNext edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== Requested move 4 May 2020 ==		== Requested move 4 May 2020 ==
			<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
			:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''

			The result of the move request was: Please comment at ''']''' — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 21:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
	{{requested move/dated\|Dakshina Kannada district}}
			----

	] → {{no redirect\|Dakshina Kannada district}} – As per, ] with all other articles of the districts in India. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)		] → {{no redirect\|Dakshina Kannada district}} – As per, ] with all other articles of the districts in India. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Line 36:		Line 39:
	::OK, let's discuss there. What do you suggest we do with the many individual RMs you have proposed? My suggestion is to close them all as ''not moved'' pending the outcome of that discussion, and open reopen any as a multi-move as necessary. ] (]) 02:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)		::OK, let's discuss there. What do you suggest we do with the many individual RMs you have proposed? My suggestion is to close them all as ''not moved'' pending the outcome of that discussion, and open reopen any as a multi-move as necessary. ] (]) 02:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
	::See ]. ] (]) 03:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)		::See ]. ] (]) 03:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
			----
			: ''The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''<!-- from ] -->
			</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>

Revision as of 21:16, 27 May 2020

India: Karnataka / Districts A‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
A	This article has been rated as A-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2019.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Dakshina Kannada. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Dakshina Kannada at the Reference desk.

India: Karnataka / Districts A‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
A	This article has been rated as A-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2019.

Template loop detected: Talk:Dakshina Kannada/archivebox

Requested move 4 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Please comment at Talk:List of districts in India#RM discussion — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Dakshina Kannada → Dakshina Kannada district – As per, WP:CONSISTENT with all other articles of the districts in India. Hemant Dabral 03:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

~~Oppose Comment~~ Agree

Hi Hemant Dabral,

~~There is no need to suffix 'district' to Dakshina Kannada.~~ The suffix only becomes necessary when there is a city/town with the same name. In such scenarios, the 'district' suffix is required to avoid ambiguity.

Examples include Mysore/Mysore district, Dharwad/Dharwad district, Kolar/Kolar district, Bidar/Bidar district, Ernakulam/Ernakulam district, Coimbatore/Coimbatore district, etc. and several others. Here, there are cities/towns with those names as well. So the 'district' suffixes are added to their corresponding district names.

But, in scenarios like Dakshina Kannada, Uttara Kannada, etc., there is no city/town with these names.

~~Hence the renaming and move to 'Dakshina Kannada district' are inappropriate and not required.~~

Thanks and Cheers,

Aviator423 (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Aviator423, it would mean that we'll have to move hundreds of articles back to their "name only titles" (excluding district suffix) also, since there are hundreds of districts in India with unique names and having no other location/city named after their name. For example: East Champaran district, West Champaran district, East Singhbhum district, West Singhbhum district, East Sikkim district, West Sikkim district, North Sikkim district, South Sikkim district, North Goa district, South Goa district, East Garo Hills district, West Garo Hills district, East Khasi Hills district, West Khasi Hills district, East Jaintia Hills district, West Jaintia Hills district, East Karbi Anglong district, West Karbi Anglong district, Ri Bhoi district, Dima Hasao district, Tehri Garhwal district, Pauri Garhwal district, Udham Singh Nagar district, Bastar district, Lahaul and Spiti district, Sirmaur district, North and Middle Andaman district, South Andaman district, Nicobar district, Uttar Dinajpur district, Dakshin Dinajpur district, Purba Medinipur district, Paschim Medinipur district, Purba Bardhaman district, Paschim Bardhaman district, Kutch district, Lakhimpur Kheri district, Cachar district, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar district, Gautam Buddh Nagar district and many many more. 07:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC) That comment by Hemant Dabral

If Misplaced Pages follows the suffix convention, then you may go ahead with the rename and move of this district. But linguistically, the 'district' suffix is redundant when no other location/city/town exists with the district names.

Also, I am now not opposing the rename and move decisions.

Cheers, Aviator423 (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree with the renaming. Dakshina Kannada could be the name for a region for someone who doesn't already know. Adding "District" makes that clearer. C1MM (talk) 02:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi C1MM, there isn't any region other than the district having the name 'Dakshina Kannada'. It is unique. But I will agree with the move and renaming. Aviator423 (talk) 05:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Oppose ~~but suggest relisting~~ . More to this than meets the eye. For example it's stated that Sirmaur district could simply be renamed Sirmaur. Not that simple at all, that would overwrite a three-way DAB. Andrewa (talk) 11:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andrewa: See Talk:List of districts in India#Discussion regarding the titles of the districts. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 21:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

There are a number of similar RM proposals which I have suggested might be best all discussed together here. Andrewa (talk) 12:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andrewa: There is a discussion at the Talk:List of districts in India page regarding this matter. You can post your comment there. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 21:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

OK, let's discuss there. What do you suggest we do with the many individual RMs you have proposed? My suggestion is to close them all as not moved pending the outcome of that discussion, and open reopen any as a multi-move as necessary. Andrewa (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

See Talk:List of districts in India#Outstanding RMs. Andrewa (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.