Misplaced Pages

User talk:444Aygoruses222: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:35, 28 May 2020 editThucydides411 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,778 edits Notice of general sanctions for CoVID-19 related articles: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit Revision as of 21:43, 28 May 2020 edit undoThucydides411 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,778 edits Shi Zhengli: new sectionNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
Broadly, ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Broadly, ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> -] (]) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC) }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> -] (]) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== Shi Zhengli ==

You've now added the same material to the ] ] three times: . This material is poorly sourced, presented in a highly ] manner, and I believe that it violates ], for which special attention to neutrality and weight must be paid.

As an article that is closely related to CoVID-19, ] falls under the general sanctions ]. That means that the following guidelines apply to the page:

:{{talkquote|Sources for any content related to medical aspects of the disease are expected to adhere to the standards laid down at WP:MEDRS. Since this is a rapidly evolving area with instances already documented of poor or fraudulent research, preprints and other non-peer-reviewed sources should not be used.}}
:{{talkquote|Editors are reminded that the onus is on the editor seeking to include disputed content to achieve consensus for its inclusion. Any content or source removed in good faith and citing a credible policy-based rationale should not be reinstated without prior consensus on the article's talk page.}}

By adding the same material in repeatedly, without establishing consensus on the talk page, you have violated the second of these guidelines. Your edits are also not based on ] sources, which violates the first guideline. Please revert your own edit, and then discuss on the talk page. -] (]) 21:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:43, 28 May 2020

May 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Beware of a Holy Whore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - SUBWAY 16:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of general sanctions for CoVID-19 related articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Shi Zhengli

You've now added the same material to the WP:BLP Shi Zhengli three times: . This material is poorly sourced, presented in a highly WP:POV manner, and I believe that it violates Misplaced Pages's policies governing biographies of living persons, for which special attention to neutrality and weight must be paid.

As an article that is closely related to CoVID-19, Shi Zhengli falls under the general sanctions WP:GS/COVID19. That means that the following guidelines apply to the page:

Sources for any content related to medical aspects of the disease are expected to adhere to the standards laid down at WP:MEDRS. Since this is a rapidly evolving area with instances already documented of poor or fraudulent research, preprints and other non-peer-reviewed sources should not be used.

Editors are reminded that the onus is on the editor seeking to include disputed content to achieve consensus for its inclusion. Any content or source removed in good faith and citing a credible policy-based rationale should not be reinstated without prior consensus on the article's talk page.

By adding the same material in repeatedly, without establishing consensus on the talk page, you have violated the second of these guidelines. Your edits are also not based on WP:MEDRS sources, which violates the first guideline. Please revert your own edit, and then discuss on the talk page. -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)