Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sathya Sai Baba/Comments: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Sathya Sai Baba Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:05, 22 December 2006 editBadbilltucker (talk | contribs)36,909 edits comments  Revision as of 18:36, 29 December 2006 edit undo67.117.130.181 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
There is no question that in terms of the amount of information and number of references that this article is at the very least a B-class article. The unfortunate downside is that, given the regular revisions to the article which seem to be taking place, that it might encounter difficulties on that basis. Personally, if and when the edit wars ever end, I will be more than happy to review it and very likely propose it for good-article status. Until the edit wars cease, though, I regret to say that there probably isn't much that can be done to promote it, as the content might change substantially between the time the article is nominated and the time it is reviewed. ] 18:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC) There is no question that in terms of the amount of information and number of references that this article is at the very least a B-class article. The unfortunate downside is that, given the regular revisions to the article which seem to be taking place, that it might encounter difficulties on that basis. Personally, if and when the edit wars ever end, I will be more than happy to review it and very likely propose it for good-article status. Until the edit wars cease, though, I regret to say that there probably isn't much that can be done to promote it, as the content might change substantially between the time the article is nominated and the time it is reviewed. ] 18:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:I have reservations about this being a B-class article. It has a lot of detail but also a lot of POV-pushing and it paints a picture that seems to me to be just plain inaccurate in the real world. The following seems like a very good bibliography of SSB-related material: http://bdsteel.tripod.com/More/sbresearchbib1.htm <br>Maybe some of the works mentioned in it can be used to improve the article.
] 18:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:36, 29 December 2006

There is no question that in terms of the amount of information and number of references that this article is at the very least a B-class article. The unfortunate downside is that, given the regular revisions to the article which seem to be taking place, that it might encounter difficulties on that basis. Personally, if and when the edit wars ever end, I will be more than happy to review it and very likely propose it for good-article status. Until the edit wars cease, though, I regret to say that there probably isn't much that can be done to promote it, as the content might change substantially between the time the article is nominated and the time it is reviewed. Badbilltucker 18:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I have reservations about this being a B-class article. It has a lot of detail but also a lot of POV-pushing and it paints a picture that seems to me to be just plain inaccurate in the real world. The following seems like a very good bibliography of SSB-related material: http://bdsteel.tripod.com/More/sbresearchbib1.htm
Maybe some of the works mentioned in it can be used to improve the article.

67.117.130.181 18:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)