Revision as of 10:23, 26 December 2006 editKkrystian (talk | contribs)2,002 edits →Subcategories related to SSB← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:54, 26 December 2006 edit undoKkrystian (talk | contribs)2,002 editsm corrected one of the things Ekantik wrote so that this talk page wouldn't be in the Category:Sathya Sai Baba. Please don't bann me for thisNext edit → | ||
Line 384: | Line 384: | ||
Ekantik, what are you talking about ???? ] 12:40 (UTC+1) 25 Dec 2006 | Ekantik, what are you talking about ???? ] 12:40 (UTC+1) 25 Dec 2006 | ||
:I'd like to know why you thought it would be useful for Misplaced Pages to divide ] into further divisions of Sai devotees and Sai activists? Do you think that such a division is useful for Misplaced Pages? ] <sup>]</sup> 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | :I'd like to know why you thought it would be useful for Misplaced Pages to divide ] into further divisions of Sai devotees and Sai activists? Do you think that such a division is useful for Misplaced Pages? ] <sup>]</sup> 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:What is wrong with it? If there can be a category page with famous ]s (]) than why can't there be a category page with famous followers (or opponents) of SSB. Moreover, I considered this division into subcategories useful because before in the ] there were lots of meaningless names and when I grouped them into two subcategories it was at once clear who was pro-SSB and who was anti-SSB. I hope that helps. ] 11:21 (UTC+1) 26 Dec 2006 | :What is wrong with it? If there can be a category page with famous ]s (]) than why can't there be a category page with famous followers (or opponents) of SSB. Moreover, I considered this division into subcategories useful because before in the ] there were lots of meaningless names and when I grouped them into two subcategories it was at once clear who was pro-SSB and who was anti-SSB. I hope that helps. ] 11:21 (UTC+1) 26 Dec 2006 |
Revision as of 10:54, 26 December 2006
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ekantik. |
Ekantik is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on ]. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! Bakaman Bakatalk 22:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Your post at WP:AN/I
Please read my response here. For help with using "diffs", read about it here. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 09:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Shashi Tharoor
Regarding the SSB controversy best not to have it. His web page is referred by someone regarding his beliefs. I just read that page and it didn't say anything much.--PremKudva 05:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK thanks for your views. I'm still wondering about the inclusion of the Rationalist International material and its reputability as a source, but I guess these things have to be ironed out. Ekantik 00:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Sanathana Sarathi
I split the article into two. Wasn't the link in the approporiate article?. Kkrystian 24 October 16:54 (UTC+1)
- Not as far as I could see, sorry. Ekantik 00:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. 21:50 12 Dec. 2006 Kkrystian (UTC+1)
Welcome to the India project
Welcome!Hi, and welcome to the India WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every India article in Misplaced Pages.
- Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Ganeshk (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Suman Ranganathan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Suman Ranganathan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 20:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've responded on the talk page, sorry for the delay. As to your other question; I'm not an admin, so I can't delete anything. An admin will look at the photo and the talk page on or after the 24th and make a decision. —Chowbok ☠ 01:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Sathya Sai Baba article (link)
What exactly was wrong with my placing that link there? Please respond on my talk page. 19.11.2006 13:31 (UTC+1) Kkrystian
But this website was not critical of SSB. 20.11.2006 16:58 (UTC+1) Kkrystian
- Consider enabling an email address. savidan 04:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Done. ekantiK
Shangri LaXin Zhong De Ri Yue
What does the article need?
- It needs more information about what the subject is, what it is for, who created it, etc? For starters, what is Shangri La Xin Zhong De Ri Yue? Ekantik 05:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh I see, I'll work on it^^jackietang33 05:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Cathy L. Lanier
You put a speedy delete onto the page of Cathy L. Lanier even before I was finished creating the initial version! She was selected to become the first woman police chief for Washington DC. I note that her predecessor Charles H. Ramsey has a page. She is a notable authority on homeland security (which is partly why she was chosen, at age 39, to be chief). (Also, you left your comment on the talk page unsigned) -- Sholom 18:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I would like add that you seemed to have misused the speedy delete tag. Please note that the criteria for speedy deletion states that speedy deletes are for articles that do not "assert the importance or significance of its subject." This article clearly stated the importance of the subject as the incoming Washington D.C. police chief. If you disagree with her importance please note the following from the speedy delete criteria: "If the assertion is controversial or there has been a previous AfD, the article should be nominated for AfD instead." Feel free to nominate the article, but I seriously doubt it will result in a deletion. - Ektar 19:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh sorry. Newpage patrollers tend to be very fast. Sorry again. Ekantik 19:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Re article Holy Spirit School of Tagbilaran
Re expansion of Holy Spirit School of Tagbilaran, I have worked on it...still need to do more, but can you check for feedback? Thanks. Please answer in my talk page.Best regards. - Pinay06 22:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I know...there is still much to be done...Best of luck!--Pinay06 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Pinay06 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Shahrukh Khan
Hello, Ekantik, I noticed your contributions to Shahrukh Khan's article and I have some questions regarding them:
- Why did you remove the citations for his announced movies and added movies to the filmography where he has no part in (like Krrish, where he is suppossed to play Krrish???)
- Why did you add to Economic Honours? The reference was added earlier (see here:http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Shahrukh_Khan&oldid=88632450) along with other references and then removed.
- Lots of references where removed in the process - why? I thought WP *likes* references. ;)
Best regards, --Plumcouch 08:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hello PlumCouch, thanks for getting in touch with me about this. Here are my answers to your questions -
- The citation for one announced movie ("I See You") was sourced to a site that is an unreliable source (see WP:RS) and is not suitable in a Misplaced Pages article under WP:BLP guidelines. I didn't add any movies though, that must have been done by someone else.
- A citation is required for his qualification in Economics because the source for that information is similarly unreliable for reasons listed above. Under WP:BLP policies, unreliable sources cannot be used to provide information in Misplaced Pages. If Shah Rukh has graduated in Economics then it should be easy to find a reputable source that says so.
- Again for reasons listed above, references have to be reputable in accordance with WP:BLP. Many of the references were not reputable and so they were removed. To be specific, information found on online websites is generally unreliable. Exceptions to the rule include articles from Rediff and other sites which are online editions of printed publications. Also, common sense has to be employed because a lot of filmi information (even from reputable sources) are gossip, innuendo and speculation so editors must be judicious in selecting which material to include.
- I also removed lots of POV sentences and converted them to NPOV. I do not claim to be a perfect editor but hopefully I have brought the article to a standard that fits Misplaced Pages policies.
- Best regards, Ekantik 01:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ekantik, I'm glad that you made shahrukh and indian actor. That's good. But Amitabh Bachchan still remains a very popular actor. Are you going to change that or what?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainman0187 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I will, let me take a look at it. ekantiK 16:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:BIO??
- WP:BIO? Did you mean Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Hinduism? Thank you for the compliment on the mediation. Unfortunately, I became pressed with other matters and had to bow out, and the conflict eventually went to arbcom. I don't count it as a success story, although some things were resolved.
- My comments on the Hinduism board were meant as a warning. Now that you are more familiar with the intesity and longevity of the conflict, I leave you to exercise your own judgement. I just didn't want a rush decision made without knowledge of the risk of disruption that may be involved. Feel free to discuss this with me further. Sincerely, --BostonMA 03:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume I, Issue 3 - December 2006
|
|
|
Rani's Page
Well, if you think the article reads like a resume, then why don't you fix it? I only reverted your edits because you removed ten references which I worked hard for and you reduced the length of the page. If you want it to read like a biography, fix it again but this time, don't remove any references. And if you do cut the length, find out about something else, add a new section to make it to the same length or more, be creative. Thanks! I think your edits were good, just don't remove my work on references. Restructure the sentences if you don't like them. Thanks. -User:shez_15
Unfortunately many of the references used are not in conformity with WP:RS, that is why they were removed. If any references violate WP:RS then they will have to be removed. Ekantik 01:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Neutral Editor?
Ekantik, can you please explain this edits by Gaurasundara: Refs: 01 02? Why are you using two names? For those who may not know, Gaurasundara is not a neutral party in the Sai Controversy and even attempted to get his profile deleted for some unknown reason . He is one of the most vocal opponents of Sathya Sai Baba on the internet (otherwise known as Sanjay Dadlani) and is notorious for his shameless defamations against him. Not only did Gaurasundara's first edit on his userpage come from Ekantik's page , Ekantik was the very first person to greet him . You need to come clean about your association with Gaurasundara and your alleged statements about being a neutral editor. SSS108 16:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Ekantik for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. SSS108 18:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Complaint about user:SSS108's behavior
I filed a complaint about user:SSS108 in which you are involved. See . Andries 17:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know about this. ekantiK 03:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
A section at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#re: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba has been started. - BanyanTree 07:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Good Job!
I loved your edits. I also helped you more to get rid of the resume tag and made a flow to the article with sentence structures. I hope you like it. Go see it! And now, guard the page, coz many people hate Rani and they will revert your edits and mine. Thanks! User:shez_15
- Thank you very much. :) ekantiK 04:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Pseudoscience
Hope this helps. savidan 22:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Re:Rani Mukherjee edits
The bot only links to articles that exist in other languages. Once the other languages update the article name with the new name, the bot should link to the new names. DHN 02:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
A Proposition
Please read the proposition on the Sathya Sai Baba Talk Page. If you agree to it, please sign it. It is an effort to build good faith and resolve controversial issues on the talk page, rather than engaging in edit warring. Thanks. SSS108 18:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for arbitration
I have filed a request here to reopen the previous arbitration case regarding Sathya Sai Baba and related articles, as I believe there are serious ongoing problems with disruptive editing and personal attacks which were not addressed in the previous case. You may wish to add a comment of your own. Thatcher131 15:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know about this. Ekantik 02:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Controversy?
Dear Ekantik, I'm afraid that I'm always involved in controversies. I really should stick to dry-as-dust articles with no religious/ethnic/national/political implications :) These days, it's the articles on Purushottam Nagesh Oak and an acrimonious discussion at the Village Pump (policy) on the desirability of including caste info in Indian biographical articles. Bakasuprman et al. believe that I'm anti-Hindu. That's a strange charge to level against Bollywood-watching dal-eating me but ... I suppose it's like some US Republicans claiming that anyone who opposes them is anti-American and probably in the pay of Al Qaeda. (They'd hate me too; I have a jail record for demonstrating peacefully -- satyagraha -- against the Vietnam War.)
I'm convinced that a large part of the problem is structural. My own panacea is we should raise the bar on heavily edited articles. Say, once an article goes over 10,000 edits then you'd have to have been an editor for three months and done 2,000 edits before you could edit the article. People would have to earn the right to mouth off on controversial topics. It wouldn't shut down controversy (some opinionated and aggressive editors have high edit counts) but it would mute it somewhat. Zora 08:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Aww, sounds a bit tough. Yeah I agree that the bar for editing should be raised somewhat higher. Ekantik 04:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Subcategories related to SSB
Ekantik, what are you talking about ???? Kkrystian 12:40 (UTC+1) 25 Dec 2006
- I'd like to know why you thought it would be useful for Misplaced Pages to divide Category:Sathya Sai Baba into further divisions of Sai devotees and Sai activists? Do you think that such a division is useful for Misplaced Pages? Ekantik 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- What is wrong with it? If there can be a category page with famous Muslims (Category:Muslims) than why can't there be a category page with famous followers (or opponents) of SSB. Moreover, I considered this division into subcategories useful because before in the Category:Sathya Sai Baba there were lots of meaningless names and when I grouped them into two subcategories it was at once clear who was pro-SSB and who was anti-SSB. I hope that helps. Kkrystian 11:21 (UTC+1) 26 Dec 2006
categories
When you move a proposal for a category rename to the category-deletion page, could you inform the proposer? It took me some time to discover that my proposal hadn't simply been deleted, and to uncover where it had been moved. The notice on the category page had not been changed either. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 00:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hello Mel, I'm afraid I have no idea what you are talking about? I didn't move anything to the best of my knowledge? Ekantik 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Aha, I have just seen that it was done by Kkrystian. Ekantik 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry; I jumped to conclusions as a result of being tired and in a hurry. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)