Misplaced Pages

User talk:Radyx: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:49, 28 December 2006 editMakaristos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,076 edits →mobbing.ca linkspam← Previous edit Revision as of 09:49, 28 December 2006 edit undoMakaristos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,076 editsm →mobbing.ca linkspam: fix link in prev editNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==mobbing.ca linkspam== ==mobbing.ca linkspam==
Hello Radyx once again. Let's please not go through all the troubles we did earlier about that website; it's really very silly and I thought we had reached some sort of resolution on it. If you look in the history of your talk page before you blanked it there are a number of rationales for why this website is not appropriate to list: essentially, it is ]. Please review ] and ] and I believe you'll understand. Thank you, and have a nice day. --] 09:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Hello Radyx once again. Let's please not go through all the troubles we did earlier about that mobbing.ca website; it's really very silly and I thought we had reached some sort of resolution on it. If you look in the history of your talk page before you blanked it there are a number of rationales for why this website is not appropriate to list: essentially, it is ]. Please review ] and ] and I believe you'll understand. Thank you, and have a nice day. --] 09:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:49, 28 December 2006

mobbing.ca linkspam

Hello Radyx once again. Let's please not go through all the troubles we did earlier about that mobbing.ca website; it's really very silly and I thought we had reached some sort of resolution on it. If you look in the history of your talk page before you blanked it there are a number of rationales for why this website is not appropriate to list: essentially, it is linkspam. Please review WP:LINKS and WP:NOT and I believe you'll understand. Thank you, and have a nice day. --Makaristos 09:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)