Revision as of 13:08, 30 May 2003 editViking~enwiki (talk | contribs)51 edits a short answer to your "nonsense" comment← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:09, 30 May 2003 edit undoEvercat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,518 edits rm gibberishNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
|
|
Regarding ], where does the pornography law you refer to apply? I don't think that you should be editing articles to make them comply with local laws. Should people in Iran come in an edit all the articles so that they fit their laws? We wouldn't have much of a Wiki left if they did, would we? ] 12:42 30 May 2003 (UTC). |
|
|
---- |
|
|
::To answer your question: Pornography law of the United States of America, such content like within ] or ] or ] might endanger the whole survival of wikipedia, which is standing on relatively weak feet (just remember how fast Larry died, and you do need a host and somebody to carry the expenses and responsibilities - like it or not - you should at least become a ] before critcizing others in such a way) - if you are interested and capable: read the German or Dutch sites of our project, those correspond to the laws (which is much more liberal, even in Germany) |
|
|
::] 12:52 30 May 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dude. This "become a sysop before you dare question me" nonsense has got to stop. ] 13:01 30 May 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Evercat, your statement |
|
|
:: "Hi. I'm Allan Crossman, philosophy graduate from Edinburgh, currently employed in a library. I'm also the webmaster of the British Go Association - see the entry on Go." |
|
|
|
|
|
::is hard to understand - you are invited too ] 13:07 30 May 2003 (UTC) |
|