Misplaced Pages

User talk:JIMBOB8: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:42, 29 September 2020 editItsKesha (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,623 edits Undid revision 980982542 by JIMBOB8 (talk) "stop getting Rash wrong"Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 17:43, 29 September 2020 edit undoJIMBOB8 (talk | contribs)160 edits Undid revision 980995031 by ItsKesha (talk)Tags: Blanking UndoNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==September 2020==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 02:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ]<sup>]</sup> 17:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

== September 2020 ==
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been or will be ].
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the ], and seek ] with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> — ''']''' 19:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing<!--
--> from certain ] ((Article)) for a period of '''72 hours''' for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;] ] 19:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-pblock -->
{{ping|JIMBOB8}} I have partially blocked you from articles specifically in the hopes you will use this opportunity to talk out what you are edit warring. I would encourage you to participate in the ] discussion linked above. If you do not communicate and continue to edit war in this fashion after the block expires, I will have to consider blocking you indefinitely on the grounds that ], and willingness to discuss is a core component of Misplaced Pages competence. ] ] 19:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ]&nbsp;—specifically <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 14:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] (]) 00:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, can you stop repeatedly reverting edits without explanation as you did on ]? Thanks ] (]) 10:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ''']''' 15:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:43, 29 September 2020