User talk:Saflieni: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:32, 23 December 2020 editNinjaRobotPirate (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,859 edits →Personal attacks: decline← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:53, 23 December 2020 edit undoSaflieni (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users586 edits Context issueNext edit →
Line 62:		Line 62:

	{{unblock reviewed\|reason=Apparently I'm blocked for asking a hostile editor (whom I'll call "X") who posts an overwhelming quantity of false accusations against me, to "please stop posting lies on my Talkpage and on Noticeboards.". My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. The latest example of the false accusations is: "Basing your edits on unpublished earlier sources or translations is OR, and "citing" them to a published source that says something different is wrong." This is slander. I did not use unpublished sources, nor did I try to deceive anyone. X doesn't even indicate which unpublished sources I'm supposed to have used. Such accusations are specifically designed to attack my integrity, and it's a pattern. X employs similar tactics to discredit senior scholars if they've published something X disagrees with. Another undesirable aspect of this case is that the admin who blocked me has posted several comments on the Noticeboard to support a complaint lodged by X about me as part of their campaign. They were echoing X's false accusations, such as: "He seems to want the author of the book to be considered a Rwandan genocide denier." (I don't) This suggests that this admin is not independent and should leave such decisions to someone else, to avoid the appearance of partiality. ] (]) 03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)\|decline=You've spent the majority of this unblock request complaining about someone else. ] (]) 06:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|reason=Apparently I'm blocked for asking a hostile editor (whom I'll call "X") who posts an overwhelming quantity of false accusations against me, to "please stop posting lies on my Talkpage and on Noticeboards.". My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. The latest example of the false accusations is: "Basing your edits on unpublished earlier sources or translations is OR, and "citing" them to a published source that says something different is wrong." This is slander. I did not use unpublished sources, nor did I try to deceive anyone. X doesn't even indicate which unpublished sources I'm supposed to have used. Such accusations are specifically designed to attack my integrity, and it's a pattern. X employs similar tactics to discredit senior scholars if they've published something X disagrees with. Another undesirable aspect of this case is that the admin who blocked me has posted several comments on the Noticeboard to support a complaint lodged by X about me as part of their campaign. They were echoing X's false accusations, such as: "He seems to want the author of the book to be considered a Rwandan genocide denier." (I don't) This suggests that this admin is not independent and should leave such decisions to someone else, to avoid the appearance of partiality. ] (]) 03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)\|decline=You've spent the majority of this unblock request complaining about someone else. ] (]) 06:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)}}

			]. Thank you and point taken. If I remove the context, what remains is: My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. That's a sincere request. The rest I will take to Arbitration.] (]) 09:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:53, 23 December 2020

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Ronnie Mutimusekwa.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! —Anne Delong (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Maggie Borg

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maggie Borg, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.m3p.com.mt/Maggie_Borg.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)Template:Z117 MadmanBot (talk) 12:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Saflieni, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! sciencewatcher (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chronic fatigue syndrome treatment, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

(Your edit added a reference, which is one of the things that is specifically mentioned as being not a minor edit). Don't worry about it - it's not really obvious what exactly a 'minor edit' actually is. --sciencewatcher (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Letters to the editor

Hi, I didn't get a reply from you about my question as to whether you wrote any of those letters to the editor. --sciencewatcher (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Administrator intervention notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --sciencewatcher (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

The complaint was unwarranted and that discussion is now closed find in favour of Saflieni --Leopardtail (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks you for work

Thanks for you recent efforts to improve the quality of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Treatment page. They are greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopardtail (talk • contribs) 14:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

December 2020

HouseOfChange, I have asked you not to take your Misplaced Pages-wide campaign to discredit me to my Talk page. Save your manipulations for the administrators. Saflieni (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Personal attacks

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per my statement at ANI. Your appeal options are explained at WP:GAB. EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saflieni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apparently I'm blocked for asking a hostile editor (whom I'll call "X") who posts an overwhelming quantity of false accusations against me, to "please stop posting lies on my Talkpage and on Noticeboards.". My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. The latest example of the false accusations is: "Basing your edits on unpublished earlier sources or translations is OR, and "citing" them to a published source that says something different is wrong." This is slander. I did not use unpublished sources, nor did I try to deceive anyone. X doesn't even indicate which unpublished sources I'm supposed to have used. Such accusations are specifically designed to attack my integrity, and it's a pattern. X employs similar tactics to discredit senior scholars if they've published something X disagrees with. Another undesirable aspect of this case is that the admin who blocked me has posted several comments on the Noticeboard to support a complaint lodged by X about me as part of their campaign. They were echoing X's false accusations, such as: "He seems to want the author of the book to be considered a Rwandan genocide denier." (I don't) This suggests that this admin is not independent and should leave such decisions to someone else, to avoid the appearance of partiality. Saflieni (talk) 03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've spent the majority of this unblock request complaining about someone else. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NinjaRobotPirate. Thank you and point taken. If I remove the context, what remains is: My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. That's a sincere request. The rest I will take to Arbitration.Saflieni (talk) 09:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:32, 23 December 2020 editNinjaRobotPirate (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,859 edits →Personal attacks: decline← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:53, 23 December 2020 edit undoSaflieni (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users586 edits Context issueNext edit →
Line 62:		Line 62:

	{{unblock reviewed\|reason=Apparently I'm blocked for asking a hostile editor (whom I'll call "X") who posts an overwhelming quantity of false accusations against me, to "please stop posting lies on my Talkpage and on Noticeboards.". My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. The latest example of the false accusations is: "Basing your edits on unpublished earlier sources or translations is OR, and "citing" them to a published source that says something different is wrong." This is slander. I did not use unpublished sources, nor did I try to deceive anyone. X doesn't even indicate which unpublished sources I'm supposed to have used. Such accusations are specifically designed to attack my integrity, and it's a pattern. X employs similar tactics to discredit senior scholars if they've published something X disagrees with. Another undesirable aspect of this case is that the admin who blocked me has posted several comments on the Noticeboard to support a complaint lodged by X about me as part of their campaign. They were echoing X's false accusations, such as: "He seems to want the author of the book to be considered a Rwandan genocide denier." (I don't) This suggests that this admin is not independent and should leave such decisions to someone else, to avoid the appearance of partiality. ] (]) 03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)\|decline=You've spent the majority of this unblock request complaining about someone else. ] (]) 06:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|reason=Apparently I'm blocked for asking a hostile editor (whom I'll call "X") who posts an overwhelming quantity of false accusations against me, to "please stop posting lies on my Talkpage and on Noticeboards.". My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. The latest example of the false accusations is: "Basing your edits on unpublished earlier sources or translations is OR, and "citing" them to a published source that says something different is wrong." This is slander. I did not use unpublished sources, nor did I try to deceive anyone. X doesn't even indicate which unpublished sources I'm supposed to have used. Such accusations are specifically designed to attack my integrity, and it's a pattern. X employs similar tactics to discredit senior scholars if they've published something X disagrees with. Another undesirable aspect of this case is that the admin who blocked me has posted several comments on the Noticeboard to support a complaint lodged by X about me as part of their campaign. They were echoing X's false accusations, such as: "He seems to want the author of the book to be considered a Rwandan genocide denier." (I don't) This suggests that this admin is not independent and should leave such decisions to someone else, to avoid the appearance of partiality. ] (]) 03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)\|decline=You've spent the majority of this unblock request complaining about someone else. ] (]) 06:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)}}

			]. Thank you and point taken. If I remove the context, what remains is: My guess is that the word "lies" is regarded uncivil so I have no problem using another word or phrase if someone could educate me on the correct response in this context. That's a sincere request. The rest I will take to Arbitration.] (]) 09:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)