| Revision as of 18:59, 9 January 2007 editMoreschi (talk | contribs)19,434 edits Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:44, 9 January 2007 edit undoVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 edits KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Seems indiscriminate and completely arbitrary. Just some recent examples given on what could be a potentially immense list. Defining "offensive comments" will probably involve insoluble NPOV problems too. Probably ]. --] 18:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Seems indiscriminate and completely arbitrary. Just some recent examples given on what could be a potentially immense list. Defining "offensive comments" will probably involve insoluble NPOV problems too. Probably ]. --] 18:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - ], ]. ] <sup> ]</sup> 18:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - ], ]. ] <sup> ]</sup> 18:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - It's not supposed to be a list, so that claim is simply false. The article is a general look at offensive remarks made by people in the spotlight, and serves as a central place to link to major scandals or frequent abusers. The article is a summary, not an indiscriminate list. ] ] 19:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:44, 9 January 2007
Offensive comments by famous people
- Offensive comments by famous people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE This seems like a fairly arbitrary collection of indiscriminate, even if offensive, trivia. The comments may be noteworthy enough for the individual bio entries, but not for a separate entry Cripipper 18:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Seems indiscriminate and completely arbitrary. Just some recent examples given on what could be a potentially immense list. Defining "offensive comments" will probably involve insoluble NPOV problems too. Probably WP:OR. --Folantin 18:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:NOT#INDISCRMINATE, WP:NOT#OR. Moreschi 18:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It's not supposed to be a list, so that claim is simply false. The article is a general look at offensive remarks made by people in the spotlight, and serves as a central place to link to major scandals or frequent abusers. The article is a summary, not an indiscriminate list. violet/riga (t) 19:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)