| Revision as of 01:00, 10 January 2007 edit84.57.181.59 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:21, 24 April 2007 edit undoHillock65 (talk | contribs)4,431 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I changed ''English: Moscowphilism'' into just (Moscowphilism) as I believe mentioning that it is in English is redundant. This term is unusual but it is used in historiographical literatureand it being an equivalent to a known Ukrainian term merits its mentioning in brackets. I would appreciate anyone voicing their opinion before just editing silently.] 16:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | I changed ''English: Moscowphilism'' into just (Moscowphilism) as I believe mentioning that it is in English is redundant. This term is unusual but it is used in historiographical literatureand it being an equivalent to a known Ukrainian term merits its mentioning in brackets. I would appreciate anyone voicing their opinion before just editing silently.] 16:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == merge == | |||
| == And how about modern Russophilia ?== | |||
| Parts of this article should be merged with Ukrainian Russophiles, as both cover the same subject matter.--] 03:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:21, 24 April 2007
I changed English: Moscowphilism into just (Moscowphilism) as I believe mentioning that it is in English is redundant. This term is unusual but it is used in historiographical literatureand it being an equivalent to a known Ukrainian term merits its mentioning in brackets. I would appreciate anyone voicing their opinion before just editing silently.Hillock65 16:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
merge
Parts of this article should be merged with Ukrainian Russophiles, as both cover the same subject matter.--Hillock65 03:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)