| Revision as of 01:21, 10 January 2007 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →curious← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:02, 10 January 2007 edit undoTvoz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,638 edits →curiousNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| would I know you from no-more-songs? <strong>] </strong>|<small> ]</small> 00:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | would I know you from no-more-songs? <strong>] </strong>|<small> ]</small> 00:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Almost certainly. I'm a member of n-m-s. ] 01:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | :Almost certainly. I'm a member of n-m-s. ] 01:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Figured as much. I haven't been reading it regularly of late - sometimes the discussions get so tedious that I can't take it. The best for me are the sightings usually. But I still get it, and sometimes do a marathon read - you may have seen me post there from time to time. I put a fair amount of work into the Ochs wiki page a few months ago and since then have been mostly watching for vandals there while getting beat up (but still standing) on some other pages (see ] for example, if you're interested and feel free to jump in...) and working on a bunch of other stuff like Obama, and a variety of Beatles pages with the most enjoyable group of editors I've encountered on Misplaced Pages, and lots of other stuff. Anyway, Ochs is much more comprehensive now than it was, and I'm pretty pleased with it - but it can always use more. Add to it! 06:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:02, 10 January 2007
Velvet Underground timeline
Hello Malik Shabazz, I just saw your argument to delete the Velvet Underground timeline. I have different views, and I would like to invite you to react on them. Thanks, Curt Woyte 09:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
curious
would I know you from no-more-songs? Tvoz | talk 00:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Almost certainly. I'm a member of n-m-s. Malik Shabazz 01:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Figured as much. I haven't been reading it regularly of late - sometimes the discussions get so tedious that I can't take it. The best for me are the sightings usually. But I still get it, and sometimes do a marathon read - you may have seen me post there from time to time. I put a fair amount of work into the Ochs wiki page a few months ago and since then have been mostly watching for vandals there while getting beat up (but still standing) on some other pages (see Talk: Kent State shootings for example, if you're interested and feel free to jump in...) and working on a bunch of other stuff like Obama, and a variety of Beatles pages with the most enjoyable group of editors I've encountered on Misplaced Pages, and lots of other stuff. Anyway, Ochs is much more comprehensive now than it was, and I'm pretty pleased with it - but it can always use more. Add to it! 06:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)