| Revision as of 05:26, 10 January 2007 editAlpha774 (talk | contribs)590 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:09, 2 June 2007 edit undoAbexy (talk | contribs)352 edits cleaned up some things and added more in The redactor of JE, removed broken external link and added See Also sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :''This article is about an element in the documentary hypothesis |
:''This article is about an element in the ]. For other uses, see ].'' | ||
| ''JE'' is an intermediate source text postulated by the ] for the ]. It is a combination and ] of the ] (J) and ] (E) source texts |
''JE'' is an intermediate source text postulated by the ] for the ]. It is a combination and ] of the ] (J) and ] (E) source texts. | ||
| == Nature of the JE source == | == Nature of the JE source == | ||
| ⚫ | JE treats God as a human-like figure, capable of regret, and appearing in person at events. JE also makes use of supernatural creatures such as ] as intermediaries, as well as mystical talking creatures, and supernatural objects. In JE, God is shown as merciful, and capable of being persuaded to change his mind. | ||
| ⚫ | JE treats God as a human-like figure, capable of regret, and appearing in person at events. JE also makes use of supernatural creatures such as ] as intermediaries, as well as mystical talking creatures, and supernatural objects. In JE, God is shown as merciful, and capable of being persuaded to change |
||
| == The redactor of JE == | == The redactor of JE == | ||
| ⚫ | JE was created when ] and ] were combined and edited together. The documentary hypothesis asserts that this occurred shortly after ] was destroyed by the ]ns (c. ]), as a result of trying to assimilate the refugees (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the E source) into the society of Judah (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the J source). | ||
| ⚫ | JE was created when ] and ] were combined and edited together. The documentary hypothesis asserts that this occurred shortly after ] was destroyed by the ]ns (c. ]), as a result of trying to assimilate the refugees (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the E source) into the society of Judah (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the J source). | ||
| Since the majority of each text was composed of traditions about events and people associated only with one or other nation, combining them would not cause conflict. However, where they differ, (for example one refers to the holy mountain as ], and the other as ]), because of the presence in a general audience of both groups, neither text could be suppressed, and the differences had to be kept in order that the resulting text was generally acceptable. | Since the majority of each text was composed of traditions about events and people associated only with one or other nation, combining them would not cause conflict. However, where they differ, (for example one refers to the holy mountain as ], and the other as ]), because of the presence in a general audience of both groups, neither text could be suppressed, and the differences had to be kept in order that the resulting text was generally acceptable. | ||
| It is generally considered as unknown how much of the two texts |
It is generally considered as unknown how much of the two texts was cut to produce JE. J is the only source used in JE for the stories of the creation, flood, and genealogies. E starts abruptly with the appearance of Abraham and Sarah in Genesis 20, which makes it appear that some of it was left out.<ref>Friedman (2003) p 61</ref> | ||
| The redactor of JE is believed to have added very little to the two sources. Only a few phrases to remove serious contradictions and continue the flow of the story in Genesis and Exodus appear to be from the JE redactor. The primary exception is the story of Abraham binding Isaac for sacrifice in Genesis 22 (from E), where the JE redactor is believed to have added an angel stopping Abraham from sacrificing Isaac and replacing the boy with a ram. If this is the case, the original E source had Abraham carry through with the sacrifice of Isaac.<ref>Friedman (2003) p 65</ref> | |||
| == Notes == | |||
| <references/> | |||
| == References == | |||
| ], ''The Bible with Sources Revealed''. Harper San Francisco, 2003. | |||
| == See Also == | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| == External links == | |||
| *] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 08:09, 2 June 2007
- This article is about an element in the documentary hypothesis. For other uses, see JE (disambiguation).
JE is an intermediate source text postulated by the documentary hypothesis for the Torah. It is a combination and redaction of the Jahwist (J) and Elohist (E) source texts.
Nature of the JE source
JE treats God as a human-like figure, capable of regret, and appearing in person at events. JE also makes use of supernatural creatures such as angels as intermediaries, as well as mystical talking creatures, and supernatural objects. In JE, God is shown as merciful, and capable of being persuaded to change his mind.
The redactor of JE
JE was created when J and E were combined and edited together. The documentary hypothesis asserts that this occurred shortly after Kingdom of Israel was destroyed by the Assyrians (c. 720 BCE), as a result of trying to assimilate the refugees (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the E source) into the society of Judah (whose traditions and religion were asserted by the J source).
Since the majority of each text was composed of traditions about events and people associated only with one or other nation, combining them would not cause conflict. However, where they differ, (for example one refers to the holy mountain as Sinai, and the other as Horeb), because of the presence in a general audience of both groups, neither text could be suppressed, and the differences had to be kept in order that the resulting text was generally acceptable.
It is generally considered as unknown how much of the two texts was cut to produce JE. J is the only source used in JE for the stories of the creation, flood, and genealogies. E starts abruptly with the appearance of Abraham and Sarah in Genesis 20, which makes it appear that some of it was left out.
The redactor of JE is believed to have added very little to the two sources. Only a few phrases to remove serious contradictions and continue the flow of the story in Genesis and Exodus appear to be from the JE redactor. The primary exception is the story of Abraham binding Isaac for sacrifice in Genesis 22 (from E), where the JE redactor is believed to have added an angel stopping Abraham from sacrificing Isaac and replacing the boy with a ram. If this is the case, the original E source had Abraham carry through with the sacrifice of Isaac.
Notes
- Friedman (2003) p 61
- Friedman (2003) p 65
References
Richard Elliott Friedman, The Bible with Sources Revealed. Harper San Francisco, 2003.