Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/East Coast Queensland Branch Pauline Hanson's One Nation New South Wales Division: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:25, 17 April 2006 editCapitalistroadster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,872 edits →[]← Previous edit Revision as of 23:26, 17 April 2006 edit undoCapitalistroadster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,872 edits →[]Next edit →
Line 2: POV fork. In itself this organisation is not notable. Delete and redirect to ] ]]] 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC) *Nobody on Earth will search for that title, '''Delete''' no real need for redirect. --]]]]] 14:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. This article has a number of problems. Firstly, it has ] problems given that the sources consist of minutes of the Branch meetings and no sources outside oneOne nationNation are cited. Secondly, notability given that individual branches of political parties are generally not notable. Thirdly, this appears to have problems with ] given that it is written and authorised by a party official. Lastly, it may well be a copyvio. No redirect as noone would look for One Nation under that name. ] 23:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)   * *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 23:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 23:26, 17 April 2006

East Coast Queensland Branch Pauline Hanson's One Nation New South Wales Division

POV fork. In itself this organisation is not notable. Delete and redirect to Pauline Hanson's One Nation RicDod 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Nobody on Earth will search for that title, Delete no real need for redirect. --Eivind 14:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article has a number of problems. Firstly, it has verifiability problems given that the sources consist of minutes of the Branch meetings and no sources outside One Nation are cited. Secondly, notability given that individual branches of political parties are generally not notable. Thirdly, this appears to have problems with WP:NPOV given that it is written and authorised by a party official. Lastly, it may well be a copyvio. No redirect as noone would look for One Nation under that name. Capitalistroadster 23:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)