Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Ed Poor: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004 | Candidate statements | Endorsements Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:30, 4 December 2004 editLowellian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,303 edits →Support← Previous edit Revision as of 21:58, 4 December 2004 edit undoExploding Boy (talk | contribs)16,819 edits →OpposeNext edit →
Line 24: * '''Oppose'''. Does not follow Misplaced Pages policies for stating credible sources for articles such as ]. --] 21:24, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) * '''Oppose''' Does nothing but add POV. Just look at his edit history. ] 23:51, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) * '''Strongly Oppose'''. Shameless (indeed, proud) bigot, as stated above. ] 21:58, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:58, 4 December 2004

Ed Poor

Support

  • Intelligent, dedicated, fairminded, diffident (sometimes slightly maddeningly so), a natural choice for arbitrator. Easy endorsement. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 23:00, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support, an obvious choice. Fred Bauder 11:24, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Ed would make an excellent arbitator. He has my full support. Theresa Knott (Tart, knees hot) 11:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Perfect arbcomm material. Has all it takes. JFW | T@lk 17:42, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Strongly support. ] 22:11, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. --Viriditas 10:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. I completely disagree with Eds POV on most things, but there can be no doubt that he is one of the strongest fighters for NPOV. I also agree with him about temp bans, i think there should be far more of these. The bellman 11:29, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
  • Support --Josiah 22:52, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Maybe the best example of a Wikipedian respected by users who otherwise disagree. Cribcage 17:48, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support Slim 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • An obvious choice, yes. —No-One Jones  20:02, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. A POV warrior, but open-minded and fair. HistoryBuffEr
  • Support; even if we disagree politically, I'm sure that he has a genuine interest in fairness and would make a good arbitrator. Everyking 06:52, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. —Lowellian (talk)] 10:30, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose. Engages in POV wars. --] 06:19, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Shameless bigot. Creates articles to justify his bigotry. - Xed 12:08, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose. POV merchant nonpareil. Sjc 08:01, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Although Ed Poor's presence on the arbitration committee certainly would make it more interesting, his sanctimonious inability to see his flaws and his infrequent but regular outbursts of puerility will lead to some impressive flareups and flameouts. Just one guy's opinion. The Cunctator 20:36, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Doesn't understand basic policy. Agree with the Cunc. ] 21:03, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Does not follow Misplaced Pages policies for stating credible sources for articles such as Demographics_of_terrorism. --Rebroad 21:24, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose Does nothing but add POV. Just look at his edit history. Ruy Lopez 23:51, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Strongly Oppose. Shameless (indeed, proud) bigot, as stated above. Exploding Boy 21:58, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)