Revision as of 22:24, 14 January 2021 editMSGJ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators131,138 edits →Request: new section | Revision as of 00:35, 15 January 2021 edit undoJackmcbarn (talk | contribs)31,380 edits doneNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{ping|Jackmcbarn}} I know you're not too active at the moment, but I have a request. Would it be possible to update the code so that it will fail gracefully (without script errors) if key1 does not exist in the data module? At the moment I have no way to see if a value is defined without causing the script error. Thanks and hope to see you back soon! — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | {{ping|Jackmcbarn}} I know you're not too active at the moment, but I have a request. Would it be possible to update the code so that it will fail gracefully (without script errors) if key1 does not exist in the data module? At the moment I have no way to see if a value is defined without causing the script error. Thanks and hope to see you back soon! — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:{{ping|MSGJ}} Done. Add <code><nowiki>|softfail=</nowiki></code> to the invocation you want this for. ] (]) 00:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:35, 15 January 2021
Request
@Jackmcbarn: I know you're not too active at the moment, but I have a request. Would it be possible to update the code so that it will fail gracefully (without script errors) if key1 does not exist in the data module? At the moment I have no way to see if a value is defined without causing the script error. Thanks and hope to see you back soon! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Done. Add
|softfail=
to the invocation you want this for. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)