| Revision as of 15:40, 1 February 2021 view sourceSnuish2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,291 edits →Critiques: shortened quote and added content← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:00, 1 February 2021 view source Snuish2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,291 edits separated paragraphsNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| In 2013, both Daniel Enstedt and Göran Larsson wrote that the apostasy testimonies on WikiIslam{{efn|While the testimonies are no longer available on the main site, they are available for review at WikiIslam's archive and the ]. ''See'' {{cite web |title=Category:Former Muslims - WikiIslam |url=https://archive.wikiislam.net/Category:Former_Muslims |website=archive.wikiislam.net |access-date=28 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323060224/wikiislam.net/Category:Former_Muslims|archive-date=23 March 2018}}}} were a part of a "negative and biased"<ref name="CyberOrient">{{cite journal |last1=Enstedt |first1=Daniel |last2=Larsson |first2=Göran |title=Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net |journal=CyberOrient |date=2013 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=64–93 |url=https://cyberorient.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/04/CyberOrient_Vol_7_Iss_1_Enstedt_Larsson.pdf |access-date=12 July 2020 |issn=1804-3194}}</ref>{{rp|64|quote=From the six testimonies it is clear that Islam is presented in a negative and biased way, as summed up in the following three points: (1) Islam is an irrational, illogical way of thought; the beliefs that Islam holds to be true are false; (2) Islam is not about peace, high standards and God; Islam is an evil, self-centered and morally corrupt religion, and Muslims are hypocrites; (3) Islam is an oppressive, misogynist and violent religion, and is negative for its followers, especially women.}} representation of Islam and "an important element in an Islamophobic world view that presents Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all other world views."<ref name="CyberOrient"/>{{rp|88}} The authors remarked that despite the material on WikiIslam being "presented as authentic" and derived from Islamic sources and Muslim spokespersons, the selection and presentation was "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented."<ref name="CyberOrient"/>{{rp|64–65|quote=Quotes are taken from Islamic sources and sayings from Muslim spokespersons and therefore presented as authentic, but selection and presentation of the material remains very one-dimensional, and alternative interpretations are seldom represented. For highlighting negative and biased perceptions about Islam and Muslims, the site is often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic.}} | In 2013, both Daniel Enstedt and Göran Larsson wrote that the apostasy testimonies on WikiIslam{{efn|While the testimonies are no longer available on the main site, they are available for review at WikiIslam's archive and the ]. ''See'' {{cite web |title=Category:Former Muslims - WikiIslam |url=https://archive.wikiislam.net/Category:Former_Muslims |website=archive.wikiislam.net |access-date=28 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323060224/wikiislam.net/Category:Former_Muslims|archive-date=23 March 2018}}}} were a part of a "negative and biased"<ref name="CyberOrient">{{cite journal |last1=Enstedt |first1=Daniel |last2=Larsson |first2=Göran |title=Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net |journal=CyberOrient |date=2013 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=64–93 |url=https://cyberorient.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/04/CyberOrient_Vol_7_Iss_1_Enstedt_Larsson.pdf |access-date=12 July 2020 |issn=1804-3194}}</ref>{{rp|64|quote=From the six testimonies it is clear that Islam is presented in a negative and biased way, as summed up in the following three points: (1) Islam is an irrational, illogical way of thought; the beliefs that Islam holds to be true are false; (2) Islam is not about peace, high standards and God; Islam is an evil, self-centered and morally corrupt religion, and Muslims are hypocrites; (3) Islam is an oppressive, misogynist and violent religion, and is negative for its followers, especially women.}} representation of Islam and "an important element in an Islamophobic world view that presents Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all other world views."<ref name="CyberOrient"/>{{rp|88}} The authors remarked that despite the material on WikiIslam being "presented as authentic" and derived from Islamic sources and Muslim spokespersons, the selection and presentation was "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented."<ref name="CyberOrient"/>{{rp|64–65|quote=Quotes are taken from Islamic sources and sayings from Muslim spokespersons and therefore presented as authentic, but selection and presentation of the material remains very one-dimensional, and alternative interpretations are seldom represented. For highlighting negative and biased perceptions about Islam and Muslims, the site is often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic.}} | ||
| In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites,"<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|161}} WikiIslam's apparent aim was described as "present Islamic history, theology, and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith, discouraging them from either taking up or continuing its practice. The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics."<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} In 2019, Syaza Shukri expressed that the lack of positive content on the website demonstrated a "definite agenda" and that WikiIslam promoted a monolithic version of Islam, both violent and oppressive, unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion."<ref name="Shukri">{{cite journal |last1=Shukri |first1=Syaza Farhana Mohamad |title=The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study |journal=Islamophobia Studies Journal |date=2019 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=61–75 |doi=10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |issn=2325-8381 |quote=...specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda...WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.}}</ref>{{rp|65}} | In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites,"<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|161}} WikiIslam's apparent aim was described as "present Islamic history, theology, and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith, discouraging them from either taking up or continuing its practice. The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics."<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} | ||
| In 2019, Syaza Shukri expressed that the lack of positive content on the website demonstrated a "definite agenda" and that WikiIslam promoted a monolithic version of Islam, both violent and oppressive, unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion."<ref name="Shukri">{{cite journal |last1=Shukri |first1=Syaza Farhana Mohamad |title=The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study |journal=Islamophobia Studies Journal |date=2019 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=61–75 |doi=10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |issn=2325-8381 |quote=...specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda...WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.}}</ref>{{rp|65}} | |||
| ==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Revision as of 16:00, 1 February 2021
Wiki about Islam | |
| Available in | English Turkish French Italian Polish Azerbaijani Uzbek Russian |
|---|---|
| Owner | Ex-Muslims of North America |
| URL | wikiislam |
| Commercial | No |
| Launched | 4 September 2006; 18 years ago (2006-09-04) |
| Current status | Active |
| Content license | CC-BY-NC 3.0 |
WikiIslam is a "community-edited" wiki that has been described by scholars and writers as Islamophobic, anti-Muslim, and anti-Islam. The wiki's mission statement is "to provide accurate and accessible information from traditional and critical perspectives on the beliefs, practices, and development of Islam."
History
The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006. It was founded by Ali Sina, an Iranian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, Faith Freedom International. In December 2015, the Ex-Muslims of North America took over ownership and operation of WikiIslam.
As of 2007, the website was focused on the criticism of Islam and differentiated itself from Misplaced Pages on the basis that "opinions critical of Islam are not censored on WikiIslam for political correctness."
Critiques
Christian Theologian Göran Larsson has argued that the website should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal, noted that it commits selective bias by collecting only negative or critical material, and characterized the website as "strongly anti-Muslims and anti-Islam." His article in Contemporary Islam states that "In relation to the criteria set up by the Runnymede Trust ... it should be quite easy to label most of the material published on WikiIslam as expressions of Islamophobia." Larsson added that "my impression is that the stories reported by WikiIslam have merely been selected to show that Muslims are ignorant, backward or even stupid" and observed that WikiIslam encouraged visitors to criticize all Muslims. However, because WikiIslam contained a list of links to other websites, such as that of the Middle East Media Research Institute, the article notes that "it becomes much more difficult to argue that all information posted on WikiIslam is Islamophobic by nature."
In 2013, both Daniel Enstedt and Göran Larsson wrote that the apostasy testimonies on WikiIslam were a part of a "negative and biased" representation of Islam and "an important element in an Islamophobic world view that presents Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all other world views." The authors remarked that despite the material on WikiIslam being "presented as authentic" and derived from Islamic sources and Muslim spokespersons, the selection and presentation was "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented."
In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites," WikiIslam's apparent aim was described as "present Islamic history, theology, and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith, discouraging them from either taking up or continuing its practice. The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics."
In 2019, Syaza Shukri expressed that the lack of positive content on the website demonstrated a "definite agenda" and that WikiIslam promoted a monolithic version of Islam, both violent and oppressive, unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion."
Notes
- Larsson's view was summarized by Ruth Tsuria, an expert on Islamophobia and digital media: "Larsson argues that WikiIslam takes a closed attitude in its understanding of Islam, and so should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal." Tsuria, Ruth (2013-01-01). "The video Three Things About Islam: Islamophobia online or a religious dialogue". Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. 25: 225. doi:10.30674/scripta.67442. ISSN 2343-4937.
- While the testimonies are no longer available on the main site, they are available for review at WikiIslam's archive and the Internet Archive. See "Category:Former Muslims - WikiIslam". archive.wikiislam.net. Archived from the original on 23 March 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
References
- ^ Larsson, Göran (1 June 2007). "Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam". Contemporary Islam. 1 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2. ISSN 1872-0226.
- ^ Enstedt, Daniel; Larsson, Göran (2013). "Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net" (PDF). CyberOrient. 7 (1): 64–93. ISSN 1804-3194. Retrieved 12 July 2020.
- ^ Larsson, Göran (2014). "Islamophobia or Legitimate Concern? Contrasting Official and Populist Understanding of Opposition to Muslims". In Mays, Christin; Deland, Mats; Minkenberg, Michael (eds.). In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe. Vienna: Lit Verlag. pp. 155–66. ISBN 9783643905420. OCLC 881140905.
- ^ Shukri, Syaza Farhana Mohamad (2019). "The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study". Islamophobia Studies Journal. 5 (1): 61–75. doi:10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061. ISSN 2325-8381.
...specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda...WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.
- "WikiIslam - the online resource on Islam". WikiIslam. 2020-12-02. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
- "Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam". Ex-Muslims of North America. 2015-12-03. Retrieved 2020-05-26.