Misplaced Pages

Talk:Mirza Masroor Ahmad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:49, 29 January 2021 editPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,717 edits Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 January 2021← Previous edit Revision as of 07:34, 2 February 2021 edit undoWaqaswaq (talk | contribs)22 edits Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2021: new sectionTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 208: Line 208:


] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EP -->] ] 11:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC) ] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EP -->] ] 11:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2021 ==

{{edit extended-protected|Mirza Masroor Ahmad|answered=no}}
In the subject Article, they are saying that the community is repeatedly using the word "'''Islam'''" (''like in Ahmadiyya Islamic seminary, media coverage of Islam, true message of Islam, teachings of Islam and many More)'' however they are repeatedly violating the basic preaching of Islam i.e Muhammad (PBUH) as the last prophet of Muslims(Khatam an-Nabiyyin). As they do not completely accept the faiths of Islam so they cannot claim the world Muslim and religion Islam for themselves. Keeping in view it is suggested that the worlds like Muslim, Islam, Quran, and other such words which are associated with Muslims should not be used in the Article of Ahmadiis as mentioned in section 298(A,B and C) of the PPC, please.

Any other requirements for verification are highly appreciated and will be provided on request Please. ] (]) 07:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:34, 2 February 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mirza Masroor Ahmad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Royalty and Nobility
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIslam: Ahmadiyya Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Ahmadiyya task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Key Speeches

This needs some major trimming. As it stands, there's almost nothing about the content of the speeches and a lot of WP:PEACOCK about what terribly important guests attended. PepperBeast (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The same applies to the letters he wrote. If nobody answers, they are not of great relevance.Derim Hunt Derim Hunt 09:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Yup, I agree with you. PepperBeast (talk) 17:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Please don't remove dubious tags

Removal of dubious tags without answering my query won't help. Please make sure these tags are only removed after Messiah is explained here for general public who isn't Jesus Christ but Mirza Ghulam Ahmed according to Ahmadiyaa beliefs. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

The article states that he is the current and fifth leader of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community (emphasis mine). Also the words Fifth Caliph of the Messiah are linked to Ahmadiyya Caliphate, which in turn is linked to Messiah#Islam. I personally don't see how that could be confused with the Christian meaning of the word. Majavah (talk!) 12:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
You may think it's not confusing but others may not agree. Better atleast leave here. For christians Messiah is Jesus and for Muslims also but for Ahmadiyaa Messiah is Mirza Ghulam Ahmed so please better if Ahmadiyaa belief is pointed to here. It would make it unambiguous. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Secondly, please don't remove dubious tags without discussion there are other people who fake care of these tags one by one after scrutinizing each. You need not to do it yourself nor everything should be taken as edit warring. Edit war is something when I had fiddled with the text of the article. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Azmarai76, there is absolutely nothing dubious about the statement that His official title within the movement is Fifth Caliph of the Messiah; who that messiah is is irrelevant for the statement you are trying to dispute here. There is also nothing dubious the fact that Ahmadiyya is a sect of Islam. Pepperbeast was entirely correct to remove those tags. I agree that this article needs work, but the official title and the fact that Ahmadiyya is – whether people like it or not – a sect of Islam by virtue of the fact that they consider themselves one and are widely described as such, are not amongst those problems. Blablubbs|talk 13:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Good so you agree with me that honirifics like Amirul Momineen and Caliph of Islam isn't what should be mentioned here??? Amirul Momineen is a term used for leader of the whole Islam not only one minor sect. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 13:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


Similarly, why not explain what Messiah is according to Ahmadiyaa beliefs... not Jesus Christ. Else is this personality can have nothing to do with Jesus ??? Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 13:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


third, how can threatening anyone of blocking over Misplaced Pages be justified for only putting dubious tags??? Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
@Azmarai76:, Honorifics should not ideally be used in running text without explanation, however I agree with Users Majavah and Blablubbs above on the misplacement of tags. There is nothing wrong in using titles or styles in the infobox which usually lists them for personalities as used within specific religious/political or other contexts on Misplaced Pages, especially when linked to their respective articles. The articles on Ottoman Caliphs (see: Mehmed V for example) gives similar honorific titles, including Amir al-Mu'minin, the use of which was/is equally if not more vehemently contested by Wahhabi/Salafi and shia Muslims. And one would be hard-pressed to find anyone who confuses Kayser-i Rûm ("Caesar of the Romans") as used for Ottoman emperors with pre-Islamic Roman emperors. -- Sirius86 23:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Soapboxing collapsed

Religious title

Qadanis are not Muslim because they do not follow the teachings of prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) So why Misplaced Pages has written them muslim Anonymous 13310 (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous 13310, because they say they are. There's no reason for us to take sides in this debate so we don't. If you are here to deny the way they self-identify you'll be blocked for violations WP:NPOV.. Doug Weller talk 19:49, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
They we declared non-muslims in 1973. First go and do some research. I am Pakistani and I know them better than you. What if a Christian say that he is a Muslim will you believe? Anonymous 13310 (talk) 20:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Anonymous13310, the Pakistani government's opinion on the matter isn't particularly important with regards to someone's self-identification. Stop the NPOV violations. PohranicniStraze (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
If he is Muslim then he is not a caliph. In Islam a caliph means a person who rules the province of Hejaz which is in Saudi Arabia. So he can't be a caliph. Please make changes or stop writing him a caliph. He is not a ruler of Hejaz now so how he is a 5th caliph Anonymous 13310 (talk) 19:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
See List of Caliphs#Ahmadiyya Caliphate (1908–present). I'm well aware that most sects/denominations within Islam reject this, but Misplaced Pages treats Islam the same way it does Christianity. Many sects/denominations within Christianity reject others and say they are not really Christian, but we ignore them. The main difference is that there are no Christian states where the church has the power to outlaw other Christians. Doug Weller talk 13:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Quick warning for anyone here: muslims on twitter want this page to be removed so beware of vandalism on this article and this talk page. • • rslashthinkong (User page) (User talk page) 14:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Discussion moved into standalone section & reformatted for ease of reading Darren-M talk 14:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

He is caliph of 20 million Ahmedeya, but 24 percent of the world population (Muslims) don't agree on that. He can never be a caliph of Islam. Raja.cj (talk) 10:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

And? The article doesn't say he's the Caliph of Islam. PepperBeast (talk) 11:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

How is him Caliph of Messiah??? The world knows one Messiah that's Jesus Christ but according to Ahmadiyaa beliefs it's none else but Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadyani... Isn't it ??? Please respect others and keep the Misplaced Pages safe of ambiguous statements. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

The article states that he is Caliph of Messiah according to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, which I believe is correct. Majavah (talk!) 12:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Druth.... this article is ambiguous and isn't clear on Messiah plus it also states this person Caliph or Islam and Amirul Momineen. Since when has he been made to the position of Amirul Momineen ??? You know as per Islam Amirul Momineen is a political position and apolitical like stated here. In short this article has problems and need to be made clear for the Misplaced Pages users. Instead that dubious tags are removed, people threatened and reported for edit warring without any reason. Isn't it ??? Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 13:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

He isn't Caliph of Islam but only Ahmadiyaa

The individual isn't Caliph of Islam at all but only leader of the Ahmadiyaa Community.

Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

And that's exactly what the article says. PepperBeast (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I wish it was ... please add who you mean by Messiah Jesus Christ or Ghulam Ahmed. Azmarai76 (talk) 11:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Majavah (talk!) 11:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Majavah He isn't Amirul Mumineen nor Caliph of Messiah but if someone thinks so he should explain that Messaih referred here isn't Jesus Christ but Mirza Ghulam Ahmed according to Ahmadiyaa beliefs totally in collision with Christianity or even Islamic understanding of Messiah. Secondly, don't threaten people of being blocked everyone here works for improvement of Misplaced Pages like you I assure you. Azmarai76 (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Azmarai76, I understand your concern however that's what the Ahmadiyyah movement claims so we cannot change the title based upon what other sects claim to be righteous ones because here we are talking about religion which for all we understand is interpreted differently all around Jibran1998 (talk) 09:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

They r not muslims Adildar7906 (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Plz remove this Adildar7906 (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Adildar7906: Reliable sources say otherwise. —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Remove this. Zaeemansarillb (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


Content

The word "islam" should be removed from this article because its a new religion. As violence is spreading due to this article in India between ahmdiya muslims and Islamic Muslims, because on searching "current caliphate of Islam" google answers "This personality". While, caliphate system had been endend since couple of centuries ago. BilloBaby (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

@BilloBaby: Misplaced Pages is not Google. Issues with the search results are a matter for Google, not us. Ahmadiyya is sufficiently sourced as part of Islam; that will not be changed. —C.Fred (talk) 22:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

[REDACTED] Media related to Mirza Masroor Ahmad at Wikimedia Commons

 Not done No, we're not removing the words "Muslism" and "Islam" from the external links. FDW777 (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 December 2020 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

mirza madroor ahmed is not a Muslim. he belong with ahmedi religion, and ahemdis are worst enemy of Islam. so please remove this information from wikipedia. Mr.urfi (talk) 15:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done FDW777 (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
37.111.128.58 (talk) 16:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Abū Bakr, also called al-Ṣiddīq (Arabic: “the Upright”), (born 573—died August 23, 634), Muhammad’s closest companion and adviser, who succeeded to the Prophet’s political and administrative functions, thereby initiating the office of the caliph.Of a minor clan of the ruling merchant tribe of Quraysh at Mecca, Abū Bakr purportedly was the first male convert to Islam, but this view is doubted by a majority of Muslim historians. Abū Bakr’s prominence in the early Muslim community was clearly marked by Muhammad’s marriage to Abū Bakr’s young daughter ʿĀʾishah and again by Muhammad’s choosing Abū Bakr as his companion on the journey to Medina (the Hijrah, 622). In Medina he was Muhammad’s chief adviser (622–632) but functioned mainly in conducting the pilgrimage to Mecca in 631 and leading the public prayers in Medina during Muhammad’s last illness.

On Muhammad’s death (June 8, 632), the Muslims of Medina resolved the crisis of succession by accepting Abū Bakr as the first khalīfat rasūl Allāh (“deputy of the Prophet of God,” or caliph). During his rule (632–634), he suppressed the tribal political and religious uprisings known as the riddah (“political rebellion,” sometimes translated as “apostasy”), thereby bringing central Arabia under Muslim control. Under his rule the Muslim conquests of Iraq and Syria began, although it is not clear whether he himself was aware of these military forays from the beginning.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. PepperBeast (talk) 17:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


He is not the caliph of islam

Sir this is not the valid report plz change it Farwa93 (talk) 00:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

The article does not say he is the Caliph of Islam. PepperBeast (talk) 04:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

The article doesnot say that but if we ask search engine that who is the present khalifa of Islam it shows directly the name of Mirza masroor which is not appropriate so kindly address it KaashifAyaz (talk) 09:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

If it's not here then complain to your search engine, or use a different one. For further information see Misplaced Pages:2020 Ahmadiyya Caliphate information. -- zzuuzz 09:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

He is not caliph of Islam Sami141 (talk) 13:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

We don't say he is. If your search engine does, complain to your search engine. FDW777 (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
They did: Pakistan threatens Google, Misplaced Pages over 'sacrilegious content' Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Its totally wrong information about caliph of Islam, Misplaced Pages sham on you. 192.142.195.68 (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. P.I. Ellsworth  ed.  01:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)</small

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2020 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
37.111.134.161 (talk) 07:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Dear[REDACTED] please remove this search results because it hurts Muslims emotions and In Islam there is no present Caliph.It is a wrong information you are spreading so its a humble request to remove it

Your search engine results are not a matter for Misplaced Pages, see WP:CALIPH. FDW777 (talk) 08:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Replaced with a free file. Praxidicae (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Change Picture

I think that we should use this Pic instead of that one used. 🤔 File:Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad.jpg

What are you saying  ? Danish AMC (talk) 07:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@Danish AMC: I have flagged that image for deletion as copyright infringement, since it appears to be a web scrape of copyrighted material. —C.Fred (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
@C.Fred: Ok ! Thanks for Informing Me Danish AMC (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

External Link

Danish AMC (talk) 11:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Danish AMC, ? What do you mean this post? Happy New Year! Asartea 09:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Asartea I just wanted to add the Wikiquote Link in the External Links Danish AMC (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Danish AMC, checkY Done in this edit. Happy New Year! Asartea 10:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Reference to His Books

I just want to add this References to His Books in The Lectures, Sermons and Articles Section.

  • True Love for the Holy Prophet
  • The Blessed Model of the Holy Prophet Muhammad and the Caricatures
  • World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace
  • Conditions of Bai'at and Responsibilities of an Ahmadi

Reference

  1. https://www.alislam.org/book/true-love-holy-prophet/
  2. https://www.alislam.org/book/blessed-model-holy-prophet-muhammad-caricatures/
  3. https://www.alislam.org/book/world-crisis-pathway-peace/
  4. https://www.alislam.org/book/conditions-baiat-responsibilities-ahmadi/

Danish AMC (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 January 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

My suggestion is to remove the word "Muslim" from the entire article because this is Amadiya community not Muslim Amadiya community as this community not accept the pure norms of Muslims and are biased , using the name of Mulims to misguide people that they are also Muslims , this is unfair and misleading to write the word Muslims with them , please remove the word Muslim where ever in topic or allow me to do so. Mian gs (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit extended-protected}} template. -- Cabayi (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
They are Muslims, according to reliable references. Misplaced Pages does not take sides in religious disputes. FDW777 (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 January 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

its wrong information 37.111.128.127 (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.PepperBeast (talk) 11:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2021

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Mirza Masroor Ahmad. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

In the subject Article, they are saying that the community is repeatedly using the word "Islam" (like in Ahmadiyya Islamic seminary, media coverage of Islam, true message of Islam, teachings of Islam and many More) however they are repeatedly violating the basic preaching of Islam i.e Muhammad (PBUH) as the last prophet of Muslims(Khatam an-Nabiyyin). As they do not completely accept the faiths of Islam so they cannot claim the world Muslim and religion Islam for themselves. Keeping in view it is suggested that the worlds like Muslim, Islam, Quran, and other such words which are associated with Muslims should not be used in the Article of Ahmadiis as mentioned in section 298(A,B and C) of the PPC, please.

Any other requirements for verification are highly appreciated and will be provided on request Please. Waqaswaq (talk) 07:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Mirza Masroor Ahmad: Difference between revisions Add topic