| Revision as of 21:37, 15 February 2021 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,595 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:21, 18 February 2021 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,595 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)Tag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Tell Abyad quotes == | |||
| The quotes portray it as a fact what happened. Which is just not true and is discussed at length on the talk page. | |||
| I advise you to self-revert as this will come up in the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan. I agree that they were accused, no problem, but that's it. Latin script is present all over Syria and not only understandable for Kurds coming from Turkey, nor was Tell Abyad unilaterally detached from Raqqa Governorate nor was it ever part of the Kobane canton.] (]) 11:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :Keep all discussions about Tell Abyad at its article talkpage. If there is consensus to remove them, then you can remove them. I just quickly looked at the talkpage now and I don't see any consensus to remove the quotes. The only one who wants to remove them is you and the sockpuppet Konli17. I see support for it to remain in the article. If you see something that you feel should be removed and other people disagree, then edit warring is not the way to remove it. You have removed the quotes like 10 times now. You did not gain consensus to remove the quotes yet you continued to remove them. Paradise Chronicle, its important that you respect the opinions of other editors. --] (]) 12:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
