| Revision as of 21:37, 21 February 2021 view sourceSQL (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators28,464 edits →Pronouns: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:44, 21 February 2021 view source Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,595 edits →PronounsNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| {{u|GPinkerton}} has that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. ]] 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | {{u|GPinkerton}} has that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. ]] 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :Didn't know, thought Gp was a women.--] (]) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:44, 21 February 2021
/
Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case
In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, a number of remedies and finding of facts have been proposed, some of which relate to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Pronouns
GPinkerton has made it clear that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. SQL 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Didn't know, thought Gp was a women.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)