Revision as of 19:56, 26 February 2021 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,601 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:45, 27 February 2021 view source GeneralNotability (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators66,837 edits Kurds and Kurdistan motion noticeNext edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*By the way, was an entirely acceptable edit under ], though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --] (]) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | *By the way, was an entirely acceptable edit under ], though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --] (]) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
*Moved to ]. I apologize for the confusion. --] (]) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | *Moved to ]. I apologize for the confusion. --] (]) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Arbitration motion regarding ''Kurds and Kurdistan'' == | |||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
{{ivmbox|1=The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.}} | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan}}'''<!-- ] (]) 02:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
Revision as of 02:45, 27 February 2021
/Pronouns
GPinkerton has made it clear that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. SQL 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Didn't know, thought Gp was a women.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The best advice I can give you - is that if someone hasn't told you how to refer to them on-wiki (some people have this in their userpages, some even in signatures, some have mentioned in places over the years) - it's best to just use neutral pronouns. I apologize for the appearance of a pile-on, by the way. I hadn't seen that L235 had said something on the arbitration case talkpage as well. SQL 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed
An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
- GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Misplaced Pages. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed
- Dreamy Jazz, the tp says "topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I have referred the matter to arbcom. I should have an answer to you soon. Dreamy Jazz 22:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dreamy Jazz, the tp says "topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:ARCA notification
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Kurds and Kurdistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, this was an entirely acceptable edit under WP:BANEX, though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --BDD (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Moved to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Kurds and Kurdistan: topic ban clarification. I apologize for the confusion. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.
For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)