| Revision as of 22:16, 1 March 2021 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,596 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:14, 4 March 2021 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,596 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] closed == | |||
| An arbitration case regarding ] has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: | |||
| *] are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. | |||
| *{{user|GPinkerton}} is indefinitely ] from the English Misplaced Pages. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| *{{user|GPinkerton}} is ] from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| *{{user|Thepharoah17}} is ] from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| *{{user|عمرو بن كلثوم}} is ] from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| *{{user|Supreme Deliciousness}} is ] from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| *Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed}}'''<!-- ] (]) 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | |||
| ::{{u|Dreamy Jazz}}, the tp says "topic-banned from '''articles''' related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --] (]) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hi. I have referred the matter to arbcom. I should have an answer to you soon. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 22:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ] notification == | == ] notification == | ||
Revision as of 00:14, 4 March 2021
/
WP:ARCA notification
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Kurds and Kurdistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, this was an entirely acceptable edit under WP:BANEX, though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --BDD (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Moved to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Kurds and Kurdistan: topic ban clarification. I apologize for the confusion. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.
For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
Your ACN post
I have removed your thread from WT:ACN, as it is in breach of your topic ban. ACN is not the place to re-litigate the Arbitration case, nor are you allowed to make an appeal of your topic ban for at a minimum of 12 months. Since this is a good-faith mistake I will not be taking any administrative action, but please do your best in the future to stay away from the topics imposed by your sanction, even if you strongly disagree with them. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Primefac, I received a message from arbcom above: that said that I can discuss the case at WT:ACN, so how can it be a breach of my topic ban when you tell me I can discuss it there? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Replied at my talk (permalink). Primefac (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)